Short-term Comparison of Survivorship and Functional Outcomes for Metaphyseal Cones with Short and Long Stems in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty

Author:

Piuzzi Nicolas S.1ORCID,Hampp Emily L.2,Shi Sarah2,Bhowmik-Stoker Manoshi2,Huffman Nickelas1ORCID,Denehy Kevin M.3,Markel David C.4,Li Daniel D.5,Mont Michael A.6

Affiliation:

1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio

2. Division of Joint Replacement, Stryker Orthopaedics, Mahwah, New Jersey

3. Bluegrass Orthopaedics, Lexington, Kentucky

4. The CORE Institute, Novi, Michigan

5. Department of Orthopaedics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio

6. Rubin Institute for Advanced Orthopedics, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Baltimore, Maryland

Abstract

AbstractPrinted porous titanium metaphyseal cones have become a mainstay for managing bone loss in revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA). A short or long stem is routinely used when implanting a cone to augment fixation and offload stresses. This retrospective analysis compared the short-term survivorships and functional outcomes for use of a short or long stem with a metaphyseal cone.A total of 179 cases using metaphyseal cones and stems with median follow-up of 1.95 years (interquartile range, 1.00–2.14) were compared based on stem type. There were 55 cases with long stem(s) and 124 cases with short stem(s). Cases with both long and short stems were excluded. Demographics, Kaplan–Meier survivorships, and preoperative and 1-year postoperative patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs; 2011 Knee Society Score [KSS] objective knee score, function, and satisfaction scores; EuroQol five-dimension scale; and Short Form Survey Physical Component Summary and Mental Component Summary scores) were compared using t-tests with a significance level of α = 0.05. There were no significant differences in body mass index (mean ± standard deviation) or sex (men [%]) between the short and long stem cohorts (32.3 ± 5.3, 36.3% and 31.5 ± 5.5, 38.2%, respectively; p > 0.05). Patients who had short stems were younger (65.9 ± 8.8 vs. 69.0 ± 9.4, p = 0.0323).Revision-free survivorship for the femoral or tibial component was 100% for long stems and 98.2% for short stems at 1 and 2 years, respectively (log-rank p = 0.6330). The two revisions in the short group were for infection, thus the survivorship for aseptic loosening was 100% at 2 years for both cohorts. There were no significant differences in preoperative or postoperative PROMs.This study demonstrated that highly porous printed metaphyseal cones provided rTKA with excellent early survivorship and similar PROMs whether a short or long stem was used. Additional studies will be needed to discern longer term differences.

Publisher

Georg Thieme Verlag KG

Reference46 articles.

1. Clinical and economic burden of revision knee arthroplasty;M Bhandari;Clin Med Insights Arthritis Musculoskelet Disord,2012

2. Projections and epidemiology of primary hip and knee arthroplasty in Medicare patients to 2040–2060;I Shichman;JB JS Open Access,2023

3. Projections and epidemiology of revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States to 2030;A M Schwartz;J Arthroplasty,2020

4. Management of bone loss in revision total knee arthroplasty: therapeutic options and results;E C Rodríguez-Merchán;EFORT Open Rev,2021

5. The management of bone loss in revision total knee arthroplasty: rebuild, reinforce, and augment;P K Sculco;Bone Joint J,2016

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3