Affiliation:
1. School of Medicine, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Rochester, Michigan
2. Department of Otolaryngology, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan
3. Department of Otolaryngology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
4. Department of Otolaryngology, Beaumont Health Systems, Royal Oak, Michigan
5. Department of Plastic Surgery, Beaumont Health Systems, Royal Oak, Michigan
Abstract
AbstractThe face and the external nose define an individual's physical appearance. Nasal deformities can cause facial disfigurement along with unwanted psychological repercussions. Nasal deformities range in severity, with the most severe cases being indications for a rhinectomy, due to the complexity of the nasal defect. According to published literature, there is no consensus among otolaryngologists and plastic surgeons on which technique or flap use is preferred in terms of complications, aesthetic outcome, or patient satisfaction. The goal of this study is to provide a comprehensive analysis of published studies on nasal reconstruction following rhinectomy. Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols guidelines for writing systematic reviews, a systematic review was conducted. Four databases were searched using a search strategy. These articles were then imported into the COVIDENCE software and went screening and thorough article review. After screening 2,237 articles, 23 studies were then extracted for data collection analysis. We collected data from 12 case series, 4 case studies, 1 prospective case series, and 4 retrospective chart review studies. The most commonly reported flaps were forehead flaps, superior extended nasal myocutaneous island, forearm free flaps, anterolateral thigh (ALT) free flap, medial femoral condyle free flap (n = 8), and zygomaticus implants (n = 6), and retained nasal prosthesis. Although not specifically indicated by a certain number, the most common indication for the rhinectomy was malignancy, followed by traumas, postsurgical complications, radionecrosis, and congenital nasal malformations.Although several donor flaps can be used after rhinectomy, we conclude that there is no preference over what flap has superior patient outcomes after analysis. As of current, there are no prospective studies that exist. Therefore, more research is necessary to determine the results of each flap.
Reference32 articles.
1. Surgical anatomy of the nose [in French];P S Nguyen;Ann Chir Plast Esthet,2014
2. Nasal anatomy and function;R G Patel;Facial Plast Surg,2017
3. Organ preservation for patients with anterior mucosal squamous cell carcinoma of the nasal cavity: rhinectomy-free survival in those refusing surgery;X Mimica;Head Neck,2019
4. Total rhinectomy for nasal carcinomas;F M Girardi;Rev Bras Otorrinolaringol (Engl Ed),2020
5. Reconstruction of a total rhinectomy defect by implant-retained nasal prosthesis: a clinical report;A Javanmard;Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Cases,2020
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献