Evaluating Digital Health Capability at Scale Using the Digital Health Indicator

Author:

Woods Leanna123,Eden Rebekah4,Pearce Andrew5,Wong Yu Ching Ides6,Jayan Lakshmi5,Green Damian7,McNeil Keith6,Sullivan Clair138

Affiliation:

1. Centre for Health Services Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia

2. Digital Health Cooperative Research Centre, Sydney, Australia

3. Queensland Digital Health Centre, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia

4. School of Information Systems, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia

5. Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society, Singapore, Singapore

6. Prevention Division, Queensland Health, Brisbane, Australia

7. eHealth Queensland, Queensland Health, Brisbane, Australia

8. Digital Metro North, Metro North Hospital and Health Service, Brisbane, Australia

Abstract

Abstract Background Health service providers must understand their digital health capability if they are to drive digital transformation in a strategic and informed manner. Little is known about the assessment and benchmarking of digital maturity or capability at scale across an entire jurisdiction. The public health care system across the state of Queensland, Australia has an ambitious 10-year digital transformation strategy. Objective The aim of this research was to evaluate the digital health capability in Queensland to inform digital health strategy and investment. Methods The Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society Digital Health Indicator (DHI) was used via a cross-sectional survey design to assess four core dimensions of digital health transformation: governance and workforce; interoperability; person-enabled health; and predictive analytics across an entire jurisdiction simultaneously. The DHI questionnaire was completed by each health care system (n = 16) within Queensland in February to July 2021. DHI is scored 0 to 400 and dimension score is 0 to 100. Results The results reveal a variation in DHI scores reflecting the diverse stages of health care digitization across the state. The average DHI score across sites was 143 (range 78–193; SD35.3) which is similar to other systems in the Oceania region and global public systems but below the global private average. Governance and workforce was on average the highest scoring dimension (x̅= 54), followed by interoperability (x̅ = 46), person-enabled health (x̅ = 36), and predictive analytics (x̅ = 30). Conclusion The findings were incorporated into the new digital health strategy for the jurisdiction. As one of the largest single simultaneous assessments of digital health capability globally, the findings and lessons learnt offer insights for policy makers and organizational managers.

Publisher

Georg Thieme Verlag KG

Subject

Health Information Management,Computer Science Applications,Health Informatics

Reference25 articles.

1. Evaluating the impact of organisational digital maturity on clinical outcomes in secondary care in England;G Martin;NPJ Digit Med,2019

2. Maturity assessment and maturity models in health care: a multivocal literature review;A Kolukısa Tarhan;Digit Health,2020

3. Technological capabilities to assess digital excellence in hospitals in high performing health care systems: international eDelphi exercise;M Krasuska;J Med Internet Res,2020

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3