Telehealth as a Means of Enabling Health Equity

Author:

Kuziemsky Craig1,Hunter Inga2,Udayasankaran Jai Ganesh3,Ranatunga Prasad4,Kulatunga Gumindu5,John Sheila6,John Oommen7,Flórez-Arango José F.8,Ito Marcia9,Ho Kendall10,Gogia Shahi B.11,Araujo Kleber12,Rajput Vije Kumar13,Meijer Wouter J.14,Basu Arindam15

Affiliation:

1. MacEwan University, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

2. Massey University, New Zealand

3. Sri Sathya Sai Central Trust, India

4. Provincial Department of Health Services - North-Western Province - Sri Lanka

5. Health Information Unit, Ministry of Health, Sri Lanka

6. Sankara Nethralaya, Chennai, India

7. George Institute for Global Health, UNSW, New Delhi, India

8. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, CUNY Graduate School of Public Health, New York, NY, United States

9. Professional Master's Program in Productive Systems, Centro Estadual de Educação Tecnológica Paula Souza, São Paulo, Brazil

10. Department of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada

11. Society for Administration of Telemedicine and Healthcare Informatics (SATHI), New Delhi, India

12. NUTES - Núcleo de Telessaúde, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Brazil

13. Keele University, Staffordshire, UK

14. Quality Assurance eHealth, Netherlands

15. School of Health Sciences, University of Canterbury, New Zealand

Abstract

Objective: The goal of this paper is to provide a consensus review on telehealth delivery prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic to develop a set of recommendations for designing telehealth services and tools that contribute to system resilience and equitable health. Methods: The IMIA-Telehealth Working Group (WG) members conducted a two-step approach to understand the role of telehealth in enabling global health equity. We first conducted a consensus review on the topic followed by a modified Delphi process to respond to four questions related to the role telehealth can play in developing a resilient and equitable health system. Results: Fifteen WG members from eight countries participated in the Delphi process to share their views. The experts agreed that while telehealth services before and during COVID-19 pandemic have enhanced the delivery of and access to healthcare services, they were also concerned that global telehealth delivery has not been equal for everyone. The group came to a consensus that health system concepts including technology, financing, access to medical supplies and equipment, and governance capacity can all impact the delivery of telehealth services. Conclusion: Telehealth played a significant role in delivering healthcare services during the pandemic. However, telehealth delivery has also led to unintended consequences (UICs) including inequity issues and an increase in the digital divide. Telehealth practitioners, professionals and system designers therefore need to purposely design for equity as part of achieving broader health system goals.

Publisher

Georg Thieme Verlag KG

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3