Concordance of Frozen Section Diagnosis of Epithelial Ovarian Neoplasm and Discussing the Diagnostic Pitfalls: An Institutional Experience

Abstract

Abstract Background Ovarian neoplasm is the third most common malignancy in Indian women. Intraoperative diagnosis becomes the critical guiding tool for the surgeons to take the decisions on the extent of surgery specially when preserving fertility has to be considered. Aims and Objective The aim of this study is to evaluate the concordance of intraoperative diagnosis of frozen section (IFS) of ovarian epithelial neoplasm at our institute and to review and discuss the diagnostic pitfalls along with the review of literature. Materials and Methods Data were archived from departmental record and the detailed clinical data of the patients were retrieved from hospital record system. The discordant cases were reviewed again in an attempt to address the pitfalls. Statistical Analysis Diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value of IFS of ovarian neoplasm were analyzed. Results The overall frozen section diagnosis was concordant with final histopathology in 36 out of 44 cases (81%). The sensitivity of IFS diagnosis was found to be 100% for benign and borderline tumors, whereas 88.9% for malignant epithelial tumors, but the correctness of diagnosis is high only for benign and malignant tumors (high positive predictive value) in compared with borderline ones. The diagnostic pitfalls were identified individually in discordant cases. Conclusion An accurate interpretation of IFS in ovarian epithelial malignancy can be achieved in benign and malignant cases, but limited in borderline tumors. Awareness of the artifacts and the limitations in mind and the IFS diagnosis can be of great help for proper management of the ovarian neoplasm.