Studies of Sequential and Combination Antimetabolite Therapy in Acute Leukemia: 6-Mercaptopurine and Methotrexate

Author:

Frei Emil1,Freireich Emil J.1,Gehan Edmund1,Pinkel Donald2,Holland James F.3,Selawry Oleg3,Haurani Farid4,Spurr Charles L.5,Hayes Donald M.5,James G. Watson6,Rothberg Harvey7,Sodee D. Bruce8,Rundles R. Wayne9,Schroeder Leslie R.1,Hoogstraten Barth10,Wolman Irving J.11,Traggis D. G.12,Cooper Talbert13,Gendel B. R.14,Ebaugh Franklin15,Taylor Robert1

Affiliation:

1. National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md.

2. Roswell Park Memorial Institute, Buffalo, N.Y.

3. Roswell Park Memorial Institute, Buffalo, N. Y.

4. Jefferson Medical College Hospital, Philadelphia, Pa.

5. Bowman Gray School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, N. C.

6. Medical College of Virginia, Richmond, Va.

7. Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, D. C. Present address: Princeton Medical Group, Princeton, N. J.

8. Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, D. C.

9. Duke University Department of Medicine, Durham, N. C.

10. Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, N.Y.

11. Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pa.

12. University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, Fla.

13. Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn.

14. Emory University Department of Medicine, Atlanta, Ga.

15. Dartmouth Medical School, Hitchcock Clinic, Hanover, N. H.

Abstract

Abstract The efficacy of three therapeutic programs for acute leukemia were compared. These programs included (1) Methotrexate (Phase I) followed by 6-mercaptopurine (Phase II); (2) 6-mercaptopurine (Phase I) followed by Methotrexate (Phase II); and (3) Combination Therapy, i.e., 6-mercaptopurine given in combination with Methotrexate. In children with acute lymphocytic leukemia the remission rate was 59 per cent for combination therapy, 47 per cent for 6-mercaptopurine, and 29 per cent for Methotrexate. The better remission rate for combination therapy is consistent with that predicted if it is assumed that 6-mercaptopurine and Methotrexate act independently. The median duration of complete remissions for the three treatments was not different (4 to 5 months). However, long lasting remissions were more frequent in patients receiving combination therapy. The median survival from the onset of therapy to death was 9 months. There were no differences between the three treatment programs as regards survival. In adults the remission rate was 15 per cent for combination therapy, 21 per cent for 6-mercaptopurine and 7 per cent for Methotrexate. As regards survival in adults, early deaths were more common in patients who received MTX as initial therapy, whereas after 5 months survival was somewhat better in those patients receiving combination therapy. In both children and adults there was no evidence that prior treatment with one of the antimetabolites altered response to the other antimetabolite. This result differs from those in animal models, and its effect on our concept of the mechanism of resistance is discussed. Responsiveness to the second course of antimetabolite therapy (Phase II) was as good as that to the first course of treatment. This was true for the remission rate, remission duration, and even for survival when appropriate corrections were made. Thus, responsiveness to drug therapy is maintained as the disease progresses temporally. It may be concluded therefore that new agents can be effectively studied in patients with "late" disease. Responsiveness to Phase II therapy was independent of responsiveness to Phase I. The most common and severe toxic manifestations related to the bone marrow and gastrointestinal tract. There were no major differences quantitatively in the toxicity for the three treatment programs in children in spite of the fact that the drugs were given in full dosage in the combination program. Oral ulcers and a generalized erythematous rash occurred significantly more frequently in patients receiving Methotrexate. Jaundice was significantly more frequent in adults and in patients receiving 6-MP.

Publisher

American Society of Hematology

Subject

Cell Biology,Hematology,Immunology,Biochemistry

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3