Circulating Plasma Cells By Routine Complete Blood Count Identify Patients With Similar Outcome As Plasma Cell Leukemia

Author:

Shah Rupin A1,Mohite Satyajit2,Baladandayuthapani Veerabhadran3,Thomas Sheeba K.4,Weber Donna M.4,Wang Michael5,Alexanian Raymond1,Qazilbash Muzaffar H6,Popat Uday R7,Champlin Richard E8,Shah Nina7,Bashir Qaiser7,Parmar Simrit7,Nieto Yago7,Ahmed Sairah7,Orlowski Robert Z.1,Shah Jatin J.1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Lymphoma/Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA,

2. Department of Lymphoma/Myeloma, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA,

3. Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA,

4. Department of Lymphoma/Myeloma, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA,

5. Department of Lymphoma & Myeloma, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA,

6. Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA,

7. Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA,

8. The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, Houston, TX, USA

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Plasma cell leukemia (PCL) is a plasma cell dyscrasia that predicts for a shortened survival. World Health Organization (WHO) criteria require the presence of ≥20% circulating plasma cells (CPC) in the peripheral blood, and an absolute plasma cell count ≥2,000/µl (microliter). These criteria for PCL were established by Noel and Kyle in 1974, but subsequent studies to further validate this cut off are lacking. Since the presence of any plasma cells in the peripheral blood is now known to be a poor-risk feature, we sought to compare the overall survival of patients (pts) with any CPC observed on routine complete blood count (CBC) and differential with those that meet the WHO criteria of PCL. Methods We evaluated pts that received hyper-CVAD (cyclophosphamide /vincristine/doxorubicin/dex); CBAD (cyclophosphamide/bortezomib/doxorubicin/ dex), and DT-PACE (dexamethasone/thalidomide/ cisplatin /etoposide / doxorubicin/ cyclophosphamide) chemotherapy at The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center for multiple myeloma from 2003-2012. We included pts with circulating blasts, plasma cells, or plasmacytoid cells regardless of the percentage (%) and absolute count. Pts were excluded if blasts or plasma cells were seen transiently in the setting of leukopheresis, growth factor support, or during severe sepsis. Overall survival (OS) was defined from the first detection of CPC until death due to any cause. We treated the % of plasma cells in the CBC as a continuous variable in the range from 1% to 20%. Pts with plasma cells below the cut off were defined as the “low” group and their survival was compared to the pts with plasma cells above the cut off that was defined as the “high” group. We conducted a log rank test for difference in survival curves between the two groups for each cut off, and the results were verified with a Cox model and both results were identical. Results 85 pts were identified with presence of any CPC or PCL diagnosed based on WHO criteria; 19 had primary PCL (pPCL) and 66 pts had secondary PCL (sPCL). At the time of diagnosis, 83 (2 with unknown values) pts had a median CPC of 4% and median absolute plasma cells of 178/µL. 73 pts had cytogenetic abnormalities by florescence in situ hybridization studies, including deletion/monosomy 13 in 32 pts, IgH gene rearrangement in 24 pts and TP53 deletions in 12 pts. 17/19 pts with pPCL received bortezomib based therapy and 14/19 underwent stem cell transplant. 26 pts met the WHO criteria of PCL at some point during their disease, including 11 who met criteria when plasma cells were first detected, and 15 who had CPC < 20% initially, but subsequently met WHO criteria.  Of the remaining 57 pts that did not meet the WHO criteria for presence of both absolute plasma cell count and % plasma cells, 13 met one of the criteria during the course of their disease. 44 pts had CPC but did not meet either of the WHO criteria. Survival data were available for 79/85 pts. Pts with pPCL (either by CPC or met at least one of the WHO criteria) had a median OS of 18.5 months. pPCL pts who only had CPC and did not meet either of the WHO criteria (n=5) had a median OS of 19 months; pPCL patients who met either or both of the WHO criteria (n=13) had a median OS of 18 months.  Pts with sPCL (either by CPC or met at least one of the WHO criteria) had a median OS of 5 months (n=61). sPCL pts who only had CPC and did not meet either of the WHO criteria (n=39) had a median OS of 5 months; sPCL patients who met either or both of the WHO criteria (n=22) had a median OS of 4 months. Based on evaluating plasma cell %  as a dichotomous factor with cut-off ranging  from 1% to 20%, there was no significant difference in overall survival based on specific levels of plasma cell percent, and verified with a Cox model, however with many cut-offs, the sample size was small potentially limiting analysis. Conclusion In our analysis of OS of pts having plasma cells in their peripheral blood, we did not find any statistically significant difference based on their degree of % plasma cells or absolute plasma cells at the time of diagnosis. This supports the hypothesis that, irrespective of quantity, the presence of any plasma cells in the CBC is a poor prognostic indicator, with a similar natural history and a uniformly poor OS. While these findings will need to be validated in a larger, independent dataset, we would propose that these initial data support redefining the diagnostic criteria of PCL to include any pt with CPC observed in a routine CBC. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Publisher

American Society of Hematology

Subject

Cell Biology,Hematology,Immunology,Biochemistry

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3