From Face-to-Face to Home-to-Home: Validity of a Teleneuropsychological Battery

Author:

Alegret Montserrat12,Espinosa Ana12,Ortega Gemma12,Pérez-Cordón Alba1,Sanabria Ángela12,Hernández Isabel12,Marquié Marta12,Rosende-Roca Maitée1,Mauleón Ana1,Abdelnour Carla12,Vargas Liliana1,de Antonio Ester Esteban1,López-Cuevas Rogelio1,Tartari Juan Pablo1,Alarcón-Martín Emilio1,Tárraga Lluís12,Ruiz Agustín12,Boada Mercè12,Valero Sergi12

Affiliation:

1. Research Center and Memory Clinic, Fundació ACE, à è , Universitat Internacional de Catalunya - Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

2. Networking Research Center on Neurodegenerative Diseases (CIBERNED), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain

Abstract

Background: Over the last decade, teleneuropsychology has increased substantially. There is a need for valid neuropsychological batteries to be administered home-to-home. Since 2006, the neuropsychological battery of Fundació ACE (NBACE) has been administered face-to-face in our clinical settings. Recently, we adapted the NBACE for teleneuropsychology use to be administered home-to-home (NBACEtn). Objective: The aims of the present study are: 1) to determine the home-to-home NBACE equivalence compared to its original face-to-face version; and 2) to examine home-to-home NBACE discriminant capacity by differentiating among cognitively healthy, mild cognitive impairment, or mild dementia subjects and comparing it with the face-to-face version. Methods: Data from 338 individuals assessed home-to-home (NBACEtn) were contrasted with 7,990 participants assessed with its face-to-face version (NBACE). Exploratory and confirmatory factorial structure, and invariance analysis of the two versions of the battery were performed. Results: Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis supported the four-factor model (attention, memory, executive, and visuospatial/constructional functions). Configural, metric, and scalar measurement invariance was found between home-to-home and face-to-face NBACE versions. Significant differences in most of the neuropsychological variables assessed were observed between the three clinical groups in both versions of administration. No differences were found between the technological devices used by participants (computer or tablet and mobile devices). Conclusion: For the first time, invariance analysis findings were addressed by determining a teleneuropsychological battery’s equivalence in comparison with its face-to-face version. This study amplifies the neuropsychological assessment’s applicability using a home-to-home format, maintaining the original measure’s structure, interpretability, and discriminant capacity.

Publisher

IOS Press

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Geriatrics and Gerontology,Clinical Psychology,General Medicine,General Neuroscience

Reference56 articles.

1. Initial practice recommendations for teleneuropsychology;Grosch;Clin Neuropsychol,2011

2. Dementia care in times of COVID-19: Experience at Fundacio ACE in Barcelona, Spain;Benaque;J Alzheimers Dis,2020

3. Atención psicológica y tecnologías: Oportunidades y conflictos;Soto-Pérez;Rev Iberoam Psicol,2019

4. Cyber-Neuropsychology: Application of new technologies in neuropsychological evaluation;Bernardo-Ramos;Actas Esp Psiquiatr,2012

5. Video teleconference administration of the repeatable battery for the assessment of neuropsychological status;Galusha-Glasscock;Arch Clin Neuropsychol,2016

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3