Effect of Age on Clinical Trial Outcome in Participants with Probable Alzheimer’s Disease

Author:

Targum Steven D.1,Fosdick Lisa1,Drake Kristen E.1,Rosenberg Paul B.2,Burke Anna D.3,Wolk David A.4,Foote Kelly D.5,Asaad Wael F.6,Sabbagh Marwan7,Smith Gwenn S.2,Lozano Andres M.8,Lyketsos Constantine G.2

Affiliation:

1. Functional Neuromodulation Ltd., Minneapolis MN, USA

2. Memory and Alzheimer’s Treatment Center & Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center, Division of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neuropsychiatry, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA

3. Department of Neurology, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ, USA

4. Penn Memory Center, Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA

5. Departments of and Neurosurgery and Neurology, University of Florida, Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, Gainesville, FL, USA

6. Department of Neurosurgery, Rhode Island Hospital and the Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA

7. Cleveland Clinic Lou Ruvo Center for Brain Health, Cleveland, OH, USA

8. Department of Surgery (Neurosurgery), University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

Abstract

Background: Age may affect treatment outcome in trials of mild probable Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Objective: We examined age as a moderator of outcome in an exploratory study of deep brain stimulation targeting the fornix (DBS-f) region in participants with AD. Methods: Forty-two participants were implanted with DBS electrodes and randomized to double-blind DBS-f stimulation (“on”) or sham DBS-f (“off”) for 12 months. Results: The intervention was safe and well tolerated. However, the selected clinical measures did not differentiate between the “on” and “off” groups in the intent to treat (ITT) population. There was a significant age by time interaction with the Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale; ADAS-cog-13 (p = 0.028). Six of the 12 enrolled participants < 65 years old (50%) markedly declined on the ADAS-cog-13 versus only 6.7%of the 30 participants≥65 years old regardless of treatment assignment (p = 0.005). While not significant, post-hoc analyses favored DBS-f “off” versus “on” over 12 months in the < 65 age group but favored DBS-f “on” versus “off” in the≥65 age group on all clinical metrics. On the integrated Alzheimer’s Disease rating scale (iADRS), the effect size contrasting DBS-f “on” versus “off” changed from +0.2 (favoring “off”) in the < 65 group to –0.52 (favoring “on”) in the≥65 age group. Conclusion: The findings highlight issues with subject selection in clinical trials for AD. Faster disease progression in younger AD participants with different AD sub-types may influence the results. Biomarker confirmation and genotyping to differentiate AD subtypes is important for future clinical trials.

Publisher

IOS Press

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Geriatrics and Gerontology,Clinical Psychology,General Medicine,General Neuroscience

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3