Affiliation:
1. Institute of Education Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China
2. Personnel Department Ningbo Childhood Education College, Ningbo, Zhejiang, China
3. Office of Discipline Inspection Commission Ningbo Childhood Education College, Ningbo, Zhejiang, China
Abstract
By constructing an evaluation system for the high-quality development of innovation and entrepreneurship, an evaluation index system was established in this study from five aspects: the background, process, input, output, and transformation of innovation and entrepreneurship, and analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and entropy method (EM) were adopted to perform combination weighting. Then, the core of each subsystem and the comprehensive score were calculated based on the TOPSIS method, the high-quality development level of urban innovation and entrepreneurship in 19 vice-ministerial cities like Beijing, Shanghai, Tianjin, Chongqing, Guangzhou, Shenzhen, and Chengdu in China was measured, and the innovation and entrepreneurship development level and structural characteristics were analyzed from five aspects. The results show that Shenzhen, Shanghai, Beijing, Nanjing, and Guangzhou take the lead in the high-quality development of innovation and entrepreneurship, while Xi’an, Chengdu, Hangzhou, Wuhan, Qingdao, Jinan, and Ningbo are in the medium level. Chongqing, Shenyang, Dalian, Harbin, Xiamen, and Changchun perform poorly in the development of innovation and entrepreneurship with problems of interregional large gradient difference in capacity and unbalanced development, which provides an important reference for understanding the current situation, advantages, and disadvantages of innovation and entrepreneurship education development in various economic zones.
Reference27 articles.
1. Research on the construction of public service system for innovation and entrepreneurship education based on triple helix;Chen;Current Educational Science.,2019
2. The evolution path and innovation capability of the innovation ecosystem in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area: A comparative perspective with the San Francisco Bay Area;Duan;Journal of Shenzhen University (Humanities and Social Sciences Edition).,2020
3. A new approach to quality evaluation of innovation and entrepreneurship education: An empirical study from 1231 higher education institutions in China;Huang;Educational Research.,2020
4. Research on innovation mechanism of collaborative development between local university entrepreneurship education and regional society;Li;Journal of National Academy of Education Administration.,2019
5. Research on the development of world-class high-level university clusters in the Greater Bay Area: A case study of the three major Bay areas of New York, San Francisco and Tokyo;Ou;Journal of Sichuan University of Technology (Social Science Edition).,2018
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献