Affiliation:
1. Department of Surgery, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
2. Department of Radiology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
3. Institute of Biotechnology, Molecular Cell Biology, Brandenburg University of Technology, Senftenberg, Germany
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact and procedural input of intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS) with contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and ultrasound elastography on surgical decision making during the procedure and consequently the outcome after hepato-pancreatico-biliary (HPB) surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data of 50 consecutive patients, who underwent HPB surgery from 04/2018 to 07/2018 were prospectively collected for this study. During surgery, IOUS with a high-resolution ultrasound device using CEUS after bolus injection of 2.4–5 ml dulphur hexafluoride microbubbles using a 6–9 MHz probe and a share wave and strain elastography was performed by an experienced examiner. Process and time analysis were carried out using mobile phone timer. RESULTS: The IOUS with CEUS and elastography correctly identified 42 malignant tumors and 4 benign lesions. In 3 cases, the examination provided false positive result (identifying 3 benign lesions as malignant) and in 1 case a malignant lesion was incorrectly assessed as benign (sensitivity 97,7%, specificity 57,1%, PPV 93,3% and NPV 80%). The specific question by the surgeon could be answered successfully in 98% of the cases. In 76% of the cases, there was a modification (42%) or a fundamental change (34%) of the planned surgical approach due to the information provided by the IOUS. Within the last group, the IOUS had a major impact on therapy outcome. In 7 patients an additional tumor resection was required, in 5 patients the tumor was assessed as inoperable, and in total in 5 patients an intraoperative RFA (4/5) or postoperative RITA (1/5) was required. Regarding procedural input, there was only a slight, but significant difference between the transport and set-up times before the intraoperative use (mean: 14 min 22 s) and the return transport (mean 13 min 6 s), (p = 0,038). The average examination time was 14 minutes, which makes only one third of the overall time demand. CONCLUSION: Combination of IOUS with CEUS and elastography in oncological HPB surgery provides valuable information that affects surgical decision-making. The procedural input of about 45 minutes seems to be a good investment considering the improvement of the surgical procedure and a significant modification of the therapy approach in the majority of the cases.
Subject
Physiology (medical),Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Hematology,Physiology
Reference31 articles.
1. Intraoperative Shear Wave Elastography vs;da Silva;Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for the Characterization and Differentiation of Focal Liver Lesions to Optimize Liver Tumor Surgery. Ultraschall Med,2019
2. EFSUMB guidelines and recommendations on the clinical use of ultrasound elastography;Bamber;Part Basic principles and technology. Ultraschall Med,2013
3. EFSUMB guidelines and recommendations on the clinical use of ultrasound elastography;Cosgrove;Part Clinical applications. Ultraschall Med,2013
4. Monitoring during hepatic radiofrequency ablation (RFA): comparison of real-time ultrasound elastography (RTE) and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS): first clinical results of 25 patients;Wiggermann;Ultraschall Med,2013
5. How to perform Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS);Dietrich;Ultrasound Int Open,2018
Cited by
16 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献