Comparing logic programming and formal argumentation; the case of ideal and eager semantics

Author:

Caminada Martin1,Harikrishnan Sri1,Sá Samy2

Affiliation:

1. Cardiff University, United Kingdom

2. Universidade Federal do Ceará, Brazil

Abstract

The connection between logic programming and formal argumentation has been studied starting from the landmark 1995 paper of Dung. Subsequent work has identified a standard translation from logic programs to (instantiated) argumentation frameworks, under which pairwise correspondences hold between various logic programming semantics and various formal argumentation semantics. This includes the correspondence between 3-valued stable and complete semantics, between well-founded and grounded semantics and between 2-valued stable (LP) and stable (argumentation) semantics. In the current paper, we show that the existing translation is able to yield the additional correspondence between ideal semantics for logic programming and ideal semantics for formal argumentation. We also show that correspondence does not hold between eager semantics for logic programming and eager semantics for formal argumentation, at least when translating from logic programming to formal argumentation. Overall, the current work should be seen as completing the analysis of correspondences between mainstream admissibility-based argumentation semantics and their logic programming counterparts.

Publisher

IOS Press

Subject

Artificial Intelligence,Computational Mathematics,Computer Science Applications,Linguistics and Language

Reference47 articles.

1. On the equivalence between abstract dialectical frameworks and logic programs;Alcântara;Theory and Practice of Logic Programming,2019

2. J.J. Alferes, P.M. Dung and L. Pereira, Scenario semantics of extended logic programs, in: Proc. 2nd International Workshop on Logic Programming and Non-monotonic Reasoning, A. Nerode and L. Pereira, eds, MIT Press, 1993, pp. 334–348.

3. A new approach for preference-based argumentation frameworks;Amgoud;Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence,2011

4. An introduction to argumentation semantics;Baroni;Knowledge Engineering Review,2011

5. On principle-based evaluation of extension-based argumentation semantics;Baroni;Artificial Intelligence,2007

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3