Argumentation schemes in AI and Law-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Argumentation schemes in AI and Law

Published:2021-11-10 Issue:3 Volume:12 Page:417-434
ISSN:1946-2174
Container-title:Argument & Computation
language:
Short-container-title:AAC

Author:

Atkinson Katie¹,Bench-Capon Trevor¹

Affiliation:

1. Department of Computer Science, University of Liverpool,UK. E-mails: katie@liverpool.ac.uk, tbc@liverpool.ac.uk

Abstract

In this paper we describe the impact that Walton’s conception of argumentation schemes had on AI and Law research. We will discuss developments in argumentation in AI and Law before Walton’s schemes became known in that community, and the issues that were current in that work. We will then show how Walton’s schemes provided a means of addressing all of those issues, and so supplied a unifying perspective from which to view argumentation in AI and Law.

Publisher

IOS Press

Subject

Artificial Intelligence,Computational Mathematics,Computer Science Applications,Linguistics and Language

Reference115 articles.

1. L. Al-Abdulkarim, K. Atkinson and T. Bench-Capon, From oral hearing to opinion in the US Supreme Court, in: Proceedings of JURIX 2013, 2013, pp. 1–10.

2. V. Aleven and K.D. Ashley, Doing things with factors, in: Proceedings of the 5th InternationalConference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, 1995, pp. 31–41.

3. R. Alexy, A Theory of Legal Argumentation: The Theory of Rational Discourse as Theory of Legal Justification, Clarendon Press, 1989.

4. R. Alexy and R. Dreier, Statutory interpretation in the federal republic of Germany, in: Interpreting Statutes. A Comparative Study, N. MacCormick and R.S. Summers, eds, Dartmouth, 1991.

5. Critical questions to argumentation schemes in statutory interpretation;Araszkiewicz;Journal of Applied Logics,2021

Cited by 12 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Reasoning with inconsistent precedents;Artificial Intelligence and Law;2023-12-14

2. Explainable acceptance in probabilistic and incomplete abstract argumentation frameworks;Artificial Intelligence;2023-10

3. Argumentation Structure Prediction in CJEU Decisions on Fiscal State Aid;Proceedings of the Nineteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law;2023-06-19

4. On acceptance conditions in abstract argumentation frameworks;Information Sciences;2023-05

5. Reconceiving Argument Schemes as Descriptive and Practically Normative;Argumentation;2023-03-14