Towards an optimal competency framework for InterProfessional Informationists (IPI): A multiphased and mixed methods investigation into competency areas, elements, and framework structures

Author:

Tang Rong1,Hu Zhan1,Henry Nicole2,Martin Elaine3

Affiliation:

1. School of Library and Information Science, Simmons University, Boston, MA, USA

2. HBR Consulting, Chicago, USA

3. Harvard Medical School, USA

Abstract

In this mixed methods and multi-phased study, through a multi-round feedback and confirmation process, we established a meaningful approach to developing, revising, and finalizing a competency framework for InterProfessional Informationists (IPI). As an emerging profession, IPI has not yet been established as a formal educational program with a guiding framework. It is important both to the field of practice and to educational programming to develop a competency framework, specifically targeted to IPI, and has been informed/verified through current practice. Our process started with using the initial competency framework developed by Tang and Martin (2019) as the basis, and involved gathering comments from numerous stakeholders, including IPI students and working professionals from relevant communities ranging from health science librarians to library directors, informationists, and LIS scholars and educators. The finalized IPI framework features four levels, six competency areas, and 67 elements, with separate beginner and advanced levels for subject expertise and work practice/culture. By including a variety of voices, this comprehensive framework not only outlines relevant foundational knowledge, skills, and attitudes (KSAs), but also accentuates timely cutting-edge skills and forward-looking elements required of InterProfessional Informationists.

Publisher

IOS Press

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Education,Information Systems

Reference14 articles.

1. Competence in intensive and critical care nursing: A literature review;Ääri;Intensive & Critical Care Nursing,2008

2. Becoming informationists: A paradigm shift;Bracke;Library Trends,2017

3. Student-faculty partnership in explorations of pedagogical practice: A threshold concept in academic development;Cook-Sather;International Journal for Academic Development,2014

4. From Standards to Frameworks for IL: How the ACRL Framework Addresses Critiques of the Standards;Foasberg;Portal: Libraries and the Academy,2015

5. Evolution of a mature clinical informationist model;Giuse;Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association,2005

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3