Affiliation:
1. Department of Public and International Law, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
2. Norwegian Digitalisation Agency, Oslo, Norway
Abstract
The 2019 Directive on Open Data and the Re-use of Public Sector Information draws together two traditions in ensuring proactive access to government data. On one hand, it embraces the concept of ‘open data’, a concept rooted in government accountability and transparency for citizen participation. On the other hand, the directive covers the re-use of non-sensitive public sector information, which is deemed crucial for the internal market and realisation of the European data economy. Indeed, the directive itself is a further iteration of an earlier 2003 directive on the re-use of public sector information. Yet, despite the appearance of a seamless fusion of the different concepts, it is important to interrogate critically to what extent open data is actually incorporated. While the shorthand title for directive the Open Data Directive (ODD), there is a risk that much of the open data movement’s demands fall outside of its purview. Hence, the present paper undertakes a careful analysis of the ODD. It asks firstly, how does the directive align with and diverge from the rationale and requirements of the movement for open data? And secondly, what are the implications of this for citizen participation? The findings show that the original largely technical principles of open data are somewhat respected and incorporated into the ODD but are disjointed from the rationale behind them. References to citizen participation in the directive and supporting documentation, while welcome, risk being little more than window dressing.
Subject
Public Administration,Sociology and Political Science,Communication,Information Systems
Reference31 articles.
1. Quo Vadis open data;Andrasko;Masaryk University Journal of Law and Technology,2018
2. Bates, J. (2012). “This is what modern deregulation looks like”: Co-optation and contestation in the shaping of the UK’s open government data initiative. Journal of Community Informatics, 8(2).
3. The social conditions of the international circulation of ideas;Bourdieu;Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales,2002
4. The re-use of public sector information in Europe and its impact on transparency;Cerrillo-i-Martínez;European Law Journal,2012
5. Dalla Corte, L. (2018). Towards open data across the pond. In B. van Loenen, G. Vancauwenberghe, & J. Crompvoets (Eds.), Open Data Exposed, T.M.C. Asser Press. Vol. 30, pp. 11-32.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献