The Boston Process Approach and Digital Neuropsychological Assessment: Past Research and Future Directions

Author:

Libon David J.1,Swenson Rod2,Lamar Melissa3,Price Catherine C.4,Baliga Ganesh5,Pascual-Leone Alvaro678,Au Rhoda910,Cosentino Stephanie11,Andersen Stacy L.12

Affiliation:

1. New Jersey Institute for Successful Aging, Rowan University, School of Osteopathic Medicine, NJ, USA

2. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, University of North Dakota School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Grand Forks, ND, USA

3. Rush Alzheimer’s Disease Center and the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA

4. Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA

5. Department of Computer Science, Rowan University, Glassboro, NJ, USA

6. Hinda and Arthur Marcus Institute for Aging Research and Deanna and Sidney Wolk Center for Memory Health, Hebrew Senior Life, Boston, MA, USA

7. Department of Neurology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

8. Guttmann Brain Health Institute, Barcelona, Spain

9. Departments of Anatomy & Neurobiology and Neurology; Framingham Heart Study, Slone Epidemiology Center and Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA

10. Department of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA

11. Department of Neurology, Taub Institute and Sergievsky Center, Cognitive Neuroscience Division, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA

12. Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA

Abstract

Neuropsychological assessment using the Boston Process Approach (BPA) suggests that an analysis of the strategy or the process by which tasks and neuropsychological tests are completed, and the errors made during test completion convey much information regarding underlying brain and cognition and are as important as overall summary scores. Research over the last several decades employing an analysis of process and errors has been able to dissociate between dementia patients diagnosed with Alzheimer’s disease, vascular dementia associated with MRI-determined white matter alterations, and Parkinson’s disease; and between mild cognitive impairment subtypes. Nonetheless, BPA methods can be labor intensive to deploy. However, the recent availability of digital platforms for neuropsychological test administration and scoring now enables reliable, rapid, and objective data collection. Further, digital technology can quantify highly nuanced data previously unobtainable to define neurocognitive constructs with high accuracy. In this paper, a brief review of the BPA is provided. Studies that demonstrate how digital technology translates BPA into specific neurocognitive constructs using the Clock Drawing Test, Backward Digit Span Test, and a Digital Pointing Span Test are described. Implications for using data driven artificial intelligence-supported analytic approaches enabling the creation of more sensitive and specific detection/diagnostic algorithms for putative neurodegenerative illness are also discussed.

Publisher

IOS Press

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Geriatrics and Gerontology,Clinical Psychology,General Medicine,General Neuroscience

Reference90 articles.

1. Edith Kaplan and the Boston Process Approach;Libon;Clin Neuropsychol,2013

2. Milberg WP , Hebben N , Kaplan E (2009) The Boston Process Approach to neuropsychological assessment. In Neuropsychological assessment of neuropsychiatric and neuromedical disorders, Grant I, Adams KM, eds. Oxford University Press, pp. 42–65.

3. Process and achievement;Werner;Harvard Educ Rev,1937

4. The process approach to neuropsychological assessment of psychiatric patients;Kaplan;J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci,1990

5. A human cerebral deconnection syndrome: A preliminary report;Geschwind;Neurology,1962

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3