Affiliation:
1. Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Universities could positively impact the health and well-being of employees through workplace wellness programs (WWP). OBJECTIVE: To assess the prevalence of WWP among Asia-Pacific universities, identify gaps and challenges, and solutions to challenges. METHODS: An online survey was sent to members of the Association of Pacific Rim Universities to assess programs on physical fitness, nutrition/weight, mental health/stress, family support, chronic disease prevention, and safety. RESULTS: Employees at 28 universities in 13 economies completed the survey on behalf of their university. Most common WWP were paid maternity/paternity leave (89.3% /85.7%), disaster preparedness training (85.7%), fitness challenges (78.6%), written policies regarding discrimination/hate speech (75.0%), and quiet rest areas (71.4%). However, few addressed childcare, breastfeeding support, workplace sexual harassment, tobacco use, or mental health. Programs rarely aligned with the reported goal of increasing employee morale, but instead resulted from government mandates. Many universities offered sporadic, one-off programs but lacked comprehensive, coordinated programming and adequate evaluation procedures. Key challenges were low employee participation, limited budget, and lack of leadership support. This study highlights the need for improved program administration, information dissemination, data collection to evaluate impact, and leadership support. CONCLUSION: WWP could benefit universities and employees but should be implemented and evaluated as part of a comprehensive campus wellness culture.
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Rehabilitation
Reference38 articles.
1. Health Enhancement Research Organization. Exploring the Value Proposition for Workforce Health. Edina; 2015.
2. Guidance for a reasonably designed, employer-sponsored wellness program using outcomes-based incentives;Health Enhancement Research Organization, American College of Occupational and, Medicine, American Cancer Society, American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network, American Diabetes Association American Heart;J Occup Environ Med,2012
3. Mattke S , Liu HH , Caloyeras JP , Huang CY , Van Busum KR , Khodyakov D , et al. Workplace Wellness Programs Study: Final Report. RAND Cor. 2013.
4. Buck Consultants. Working well: a global survey of workforce wellbeing strategies. 2018.
5. Effectiveness of interventions targeting health behaviors in university and college staff: A systematic review;Plotnikoff;Am J Heal Promot,2015