Telemedicine in Italy: Healthcare authorization profiles in the modern medico-legal reading

Author:

Bolcato Vittorio1,Basile Giuseppe23,Bianco Prevot Luca2,Fassina Giovanni45,Rapuano Silvia6,Brizioli Enrico6,Tronconi Livio P.67

Affiliation:

1. Astolfi Associati Legal Firm, , Italy

2. , IRCCS Galeazzi Orthopaedics Institute, , Italy

3. , Clinical Institute San Siro, , Italy

4. , University of Pavia, , Italy

5. , IRCCS Fondazione Istituto Neurologico Nazionale C. Mondino, , Italy

6. GVM Care and Research, Maria Cecilia Hospital, , Italy

7. , European University of Rome, , Italy

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The ruling n. 38485, 20 June 2019, of the Italian Supreme Court, III criminal section, addressed by the perspective of the law the very sensitive and new issue of telemedicine. OBJECTIVE: This commentary deals with the issue of authorization of telemedicine activities by the health authority, starting from the Italian Court of Criminal Cassation, III section, decision n. 38485/2019. The case law explored the authorization of a health point, which carries out telemedicine services. METHODS: Starting from the perspective discussed by Italian health regulations, the paper examines how the health act could be defined, with the possibilities offered by telecommunications, and how it now relates legally to the physical place where it takes place. RESULTS: Even if telemedicine opens the way to virtual spaces of health practice, the Ministry of Health Italian Guidelines pose functional and logistical issues to guarantee users’ safety and health care system accountability. Then, functional requirements for health legitimate practice, and their continuous monitoring, together with the responsibilities of the service centers, health professionals and health facilities, are discussed. CONCLUSION: The questioning of States’ health law, in a broad health system such as that of the Europe, characterized by autonomous health regulations, is extremely important for cross-border health policy with telemedicine, as overall regulatory compliance in health care is the ground criterion for risk prevention and patient safety, to be properly verified.

Publisher

IOS Press

Reference41 articles.

1. Corte di Cassazione Penale sezione III. Sentenza n. 38485 del 20.06.2019 - Ruling n. 38485, 20 June 2019. 2019.

2. Healthcare professional and manager perceptions on drivers, benefits, and challenges of telemedicine: Results from a cross-sectional survey in the Italian NHS;Antonacci;BMC Health Serv Res,2023

3. Servizi al paziente: quando si tratta di telemedicina e quali sono le relative implicazioni (focus sulla necessità della preventiva autorizzazione regionale) - Patient services: when is telemedicine and what are its implications;Cecchi;Rass di Dirit Farm e della Salut,2021

4. Corte di Cassazione Penale sezione III. Sentenza 25 maggio 2007, n. 2047 - Ruling 25 May 2007, n. 20474. 2007.

5. Regione Emilia-Romagna Direzione generale cura della persona salute e welfare - Emilia-Romagna Region Health and Welfare General Directorate. Circolare 2/2021 - Assistenza Specialistica Ambulatoriale: precisazioni relative alla DGR 1227/2021 “Indicazioni in merito all’erogazione di servizi di telemedicina nelle strutture del servizio sanitario regionale”. 2021.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3