Deep learning image reconstruction for quality assessment of iodine concentration in computed tomography: A phantom study

Author:

Jeon Pil-Hyun1,Lee Chang-Lae2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju Severance Christian Hospital, Wonju-Si, Gangwon-Do, Republic of Korea

2. Health & Medical Equipment Business Unit, Samsung Electronics, Suwon-Si, Gyeonggi-Do, Republic of Korea

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recently, deep learning reconstruction (DLR) technology aiming to improve image quality with minimal radiation dose has been applied not only to pediatric scans, but also to computed tomography angiography (CTA). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate image quality characteristics of filtered back projection (FBP), hybrid iterative reconstruction [Adaptive Iterative Dose Reduction 3D (AIDR 3D)], and DLR (AiCE) using different iodine concentrations and scan parameters. METHODS: Phantoms with eight iodine concentrations (ranging from 1.2 to 25.9 mg/mL) located at the edge of a cylindrical water phantom with a diameter of 19 cm were scanned. Data were reconstructed with FBP, AIDR 3D, and AiCE using various scan parameters of tube current and voltage using a 320 row-detector CT scanner. Data obtained using different reconstruction techniques were quantitatively compared by analyzing Hounsfield units (HU), noise, and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs). RESULTS: HU values of FBP and AIDR 3D were constant even when the iodine concentration was changed, whereas AiCE showed the highest HU value when the iodine concentration was low, but the HU value reversed when the iodine concentration exceeded a certain value. In the AIDR 3D and AiCE, the noise decreased as the tube current increased, and the change in noise when the iodine concentration was inconsistent. AIDR 3D and AiCE yielded better noise reduction rates than with FBP at a low tube current. The noise reduction rate of AIDR 3D and AiCE compared to that of FBP showed characteristics ranging from 7% to 35%, and the noise reduction rate of AiCE compared to that of AIDR 3D ranged from 2.0% to 13.3%. CONCLUSIONS: The evaluated reconstruction techniques showed different image quality characteristics (HU value, noise, and CNR) according to dose and scan parameters, and users must consider these results and characteristics before performing patient scans.

Publisher

IOS Press

Subject

Electrical and Electronic Engineering,Condensed Matter Physics,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,Instrumentation,Radiation

Reference30 articles.

1. DNA double-strand breaks and their repair in blood lymphocytes of patients undergoing angiographic procedures;Kuefner;Investigative Radiology,2009

2. Use of 320-detector computed tomographic angiography for infants and young children with congenital heart disease;Al-Mousily;Pediatric Cardiology,2011

3. Side effects of radiographic contrast media: Pathogenesis, risk factors, and prevention;Andreucci;BioMed Research International,2014

4. Computed tomography–old ideas and new technology;Fleischmann;European Radiology,2011

5. Iterative reconstruction techniques for computed tomography Part 1: Technical principles;Willemink;European Radiology,2013

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3