Affiliation:
1. Institute for Clinical Chemistry, University Hospital Mannheim of the University of Heidelberg, Germany
2. National Genetics Reference Laboratory (Manchester), St Mary’s Hospital, Manchester, United Kingdom
3. Clinical Biochemistry Unit, Department of Clinical Physiopathology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
Abstract
Abstract
Background: From 2003 to 2005, the European Union supported the EQUAL-initiative to develop methodological external quality assessment (EQA) schemes for genotyping (EQUALqual), quantitative PCR (EQUALquant), and sequencing (EQUALseq). As a relevant part of the EQUALseq program, a training course was held subsequent to the first EQA Program (EQAP1). The success of this course was reassessed in a 2nd EQUALseq round (EQAP2).
Methods: In September 2005, a 3-day training course took place. We invited 8 laboratories with below-average performance in EQAP1 to improve their methodological and analytical/proficiency skills by lectures and practical work. To compare the results of the pretraining and posttraining EQUALseq rounds, we distributed 2 samples used in the first EQUAL round, but this time we provided different oligonucleotide sets. We evaluated the results by means of a previously described scoring system.
Results: In EQAP2, 6 laboratories returned complete data sets, corresponding to an overall 14% of the 43 laboratories that had finished EQAP1. The scoring results for samples A (P = 0.0025) and B (P = 0.0125) demonstrated a significant improvement in EQAP2. Overall, a substantial improvement of technical and interpretative skills was demonstrated (P = 0.0051). In general, the workshop experience was highly rated by the participants.
Conclusions: Methodologic EQAPs in DNA sequencing are appropriate tools to uncover strengths and weaknesses in both technique and proficiency, emphasizing the need for mandatory EQAPs. Training courses, together with 2nd-round reiterations, should be implemented into methodological EQAPs in molecular diagnostics to improve technical performance and proficiency in genetic testing.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Biochemistry (medical),Clinical Biochemistry
Reference11 articles.
1. European Commission. 25 recommendations on the ethical, legal and social implications of genetic testing. http://europa.eu.int/comm/research/conferences/2004/genetic/recommendations_en.htm (accessed March 2006)..
2. Ibaretta D, Elles R, Cassiman JJ, Rodriguez-Cerezo E, Dequeker E. Towards quality assurance and harmonization of genetic testing services in the European Union. Nat Biotechnol. 2004;22:1230-1235.
3. Neumaier M, Braun A, Gessner R, Funke H. Experiences with external quality assessment (EQA) in molecular diagnostics in clinical laboratories in Germany. Clin Chem Lab Med2000;38:161-163.
4. OECD. Quality assurance and proficiency testing for molecular genetic testing. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/25/12/34779945.pdf. (accessed March 2006)..
5. Eurogentest. Molecular genetic testing – External quality assessment scheme provision (2005). http://www.eurogentest.org/cocoon/egtorg/web/files/public/unit1/EuroEQAprovision2005.pdf.xhtml (accessed March 2006)..
Cited by
12 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献