A Paradigm Shift: Considerations in Prenatal Cell-Free DNA Screening

Author:

Dines Jennifer N1,Eckel Ashley M2,Cheng Edith Y13,Lockwood Christina M2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Genetics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA

2. Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA

3. Department of Medicine, Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA

Abstract

Abstract Background Testing to determine the health of a fetus has undergone multiple iterations since the widespread adoption of amniocentesis in the 1970s, including several combinations of ultrasound and/or maternal serum screening. The clinical paradigm for prenatal screening for fetal chromosome aneuploidies was transformed by the introduction of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) screening or noninvasive prenatal screening in 2011. Content The clinical performance of cfDNA screening is well-established for the most common autosomal and sex chromosome aneuploidies with a detection rate exceeding 90% for all aneuploidies. One of the most significant advantages of cfDNA screening relative to maternal serum screening is the markedly reduced false-positive rate, which is <0.5%. The clinical implementation of cfDNA screening is discussed at length, including key biological, preanalytical, and analytical factors that affect test performance. Summary cfDNA prenatal screening for whole chromosome aneuploidies has become routine in high-risk obstetric populations. There is tremendous interest in expanding cfDNA screening to the general obstetric population. Early studies suggest that routine application of cfDNA screening is both feasible and effective, although significant economic and quality control considerations remain.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

General Medicine

Reference64 articles.

1. Present status of amniocentesis in intrauterine diagnosis of genetic defects;Nadler;Obstet Gynecol,1971

2. Fetal sex prediction by sex chromatin of chorionic villi cells during early pregnancy;Chin Med J (Engl),1975

3. Method of sampling chorionic villi in first trimester of pregnancy under guidance of real time ultrasound;Ward;Br Med J (Clin Res Ed),1983

4. Fetal loss rate and associated risk factors after amniocentesis, chorionic villus sampling and fetal blood sampling;Enzensberger;Ultraschall Med,2012

5. Procedure-related risk of miscarriage following amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling: a systematic review and meta-analysis;Akolekar;Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol,2015

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3