Frequency that Laboratory Tests Influence Medical Decisions

Author:

Ngo Andy1,Gandhi Paras1,Miller W Greg1

Affiliation:

1. Virginia Commonwealth University, Department of Pathology, Richmond, VA

Abstract

Abstract Background Among the variables that influence medical decisions, laboratory tests are considered to be among the most important and frequently used. The influence of laboratory tests on medical decisions has been difficult to estimate. The goal of this study was to estimate the number of patient encounters that included a laboratory test. Methods We extracted information for 72196 patient encounters from 1-week intervals each quarter of a year from our comprehensive academic medical center electronic medical record. The patients examined represent a comprehensive range of clinical conditions and medical services. We determined for which encounters laboratory and other orders existed. Results Overall 35% of encounters had 1 or more laboratory tests ordered. However, the percent varied markedly with patient care areas. For inpatient, emergency department, and outpatient populations, 98%, 56%, and 29%, respectively, had 1 or more laboratory tests ordered. Conclusions Our observations support that it is not possible to use a single number to categorize the frequency with which laboratory tests occur in patient encounters. Utilization of laboratory tests varied with type of medical service with almost all inpatients, approximately half of emergency department patients, and nearly one-third of outpatients having laboratory tests during their healthcare visit.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

General Medicine

Reference6 articles.

1. The “70% claim”: what is the evidence base?;Hallworth;Ann Clin Biochem,2011

2. The value of in vitro diagnostic testing in medical practice: a status report;Rohr;PLoS One,2016

3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National hospital ambulatory medical care survey. 2010. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/ahcd/nhamcs_emergency/2010_ed_web_tables.pdf (Accessed November 2016).

4. Issues and initiatives in the testing process in primary care physician offices;Hickner;Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf,2005

5. When diagnostic testing leads to harm: a new outcomes-based approach for laboratory medicine;Epner;BMJ Qual Saf,2013

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3