Phase I Study of Sequential Vaccinations With Fowlpox-CEA(6D)-TRICOM Alone and Sequentially With Vaccinia-CEA(6D)-TRICOM, With and Without Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor, in Patients With Carcinoembryonic Antigen–Expressing Carcinomas
-
Published:2005-02-01
Issue:4
Volume:23
Page:720-731
-
ISSN:0732-183X
-
Container-title:Journal of Clinical Oncology
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:JCO
Author:
Marshall John L.1, Gulley James L.1, Arlen Philip M.1, Beetham Patricia K.1, Tsang Kwong-Yok1, Slack Rebecca1, Hodge James W.1, Doren Sandra1, Grosenbach Douglas W.1, Hwang Jimmy1, Fox Evelyn1, Odogwu Lauretta1, Park Susie1, Panicali Dennis1, Schlom Jeffrey1
Affiliation:
1. From the Lombardi Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington DC; Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Biology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD; and Therion Biologics Corporation, Cambridge, MA
Abstract
Purpose Our previous clinical experience with vaccinia and replication-defective avipox recombinant carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) vaccines has demonstrated safety and clinical activity with a correlation between CEA-specific immune response and survival. Preclinical evidence demonstrated that the addition of the transgenes for three T-cell costimulatory molecules (B7-1, ICAM-1, LFA-3, designated TRICOM) results in a significant improvement in antigen-specific T-cell responses and antitumor activity. We describe here the first trial in humans of the CEA-TRICOM vaccines (also including an enhancer agonist epitope within the CEA gene). Patients and Methods Fifty-eight patients with advanced CEA-expressing cancers were accrued to eight cohorts that involved vaccinations with the following: replication-defective fowlpox recombinant (rF)-CEA(6D)-TRICOM; primary vaccination with recombinant vaccinia (rV)-CEA(6D)-TRICOM plus rF-CEA(6D)-TRICOM booster vaccinations; and rV-CEA(6D)-TRICOM and then rF-CEA(6D)-TRICOM, plus granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) with vaccines, or with divided doses of vaccine with GM-CSF. Vaccines were administered every 28 days for six doses and then once every 3 months. Reverting to treatments every 28 days was allowed if patients progressed on the 3-month schedule. Results In this phase I study, no significant toxicity was observed. Twenty-three patients (40%) had stable disease for at least 4 months, with 14 of these patients having prolonged stable disease (> 6 months). Eleven patients had decreasing or stable serum CEA, and one patient had a pathologic complete response. Enhanced CEA-specific T-cell responses were observed in the majority of patients tested. Conclusion We demonstrated that the CEA-TRICOM vaccines are safe and can generate significant CEA-specific immune responses, and they seem to have clinical benefit in some patients with advanced cancer.
Publisher
American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
Subject
Cancer Research,Oncology
Reference40 articles.
1. Carcinoembryonic antigen gene family: Molecular biology and clinical perspectives 2. Kaufman HL, Schlom J: Vaccines for colon cancer, in Stern P, Beverly P, Carroll M (eds): Cancer vaccines and immunotherapy . Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press, pp,2000 107-134 3. Schlom J: Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) peptides and vaccines for carcinoma, in Kast M (ed): Peptide-based cancer vaccines . Austin, TX, Landes Bioscience, pp,2000 90-105 4. Kass ES, Greiner JW, Kantor JA, et al: Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) as a target for specific antitumor immunotherapy of head and neck cancer. Cancer Res 62:5049,2002-5067, 5. General Keynote: Vaccine Strategies for the Therapy of Ovarian Cancer
Cited by
262 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|