The prevalence of cough in lung cancer: Its characteristics and predictors.

Author:

Harle Amelie Sylvia Mary1,Buffin Oliver2,Burnham Jack2,Molassiotis Alex3,Blackhall Fiona Helen1,Smith Jaclyn A4

Affiliation:

1. The Christie Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom

2. University of Manchester Medical School, Manchester, United Kingdom

3. Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, Hong Kong

4. University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom

Abstract

162 Background: Cough commonly affects patients with LC but quoted prevalence figures vary and most were obtained before advances in anticancer treatment for LC. This study aimed to determine its prevalence and characteristics (severity, impact and potential predictors) in patients undergoing standard treatment and follow up. Methods: Consecutive LC patients attending clinics at The Christie Hospital, UK during a predefined 5 week period were asked whether they had a cough and invited to participate in its further evaluation according to an ethically approved protocol. Demographic, cancer and cancer treatment data were collected in all. Patients with a cough also completed subjective assessments using the validated cough impact Manchester cough in LC scale (MCLCS) and cough severity visual analogue scale (VAS). Standard statistical tests were used for analysis with significance (p<0.05). Results: Of 223 consecutive LC outpatients approached, the prevalence of cough was 57% (128/223); 202/223 (86%) consented to further data collection (study population) and of these 115 (57%) reported cough. The majority (60/115, 52%) felt that their cough warranted treatment and 23% reported their cough to be painful (26/115). The median VAS score (n=115) was 32mm (25th-75th IQR 20-51, range 0-100, high scores = worse cough severity). The median MCLCS score (n=113) was 22 (25th-75th IQR 16-27, range 1-50, high scores = worse cough impact). There was no significant difference between coughers and non-coughers with respect to age, sex, co-morbidities, smoking, performance status, treatment intent, treatment type, reasons for not receiving treatment, stage and histology. The proportion of non-coughers was lower among patients receiving anticancer therapy (45/115 39% vs 47/87 54%, p=0.04) in univariate analysis. Conclusions: Cough is present in the majority of LC patients, even in those undergoing treatment. Many patients feel that it warrants treatment. Whilst many consider factors such smoking, stage, histology and cancer treatment type to be important determinants of the presence of cough, our data does not reflect this. Improving LC related cough requires more than better cancer therapies.

Publisher

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3