Dose-Response Trial of Megestrol Acetate in Advanced Breast Cancer: Cancer and Leukemia Group B Phase III Study 8741
-
Published:1999-01
Issue:1
Volume:17
Page:64-64
-
ISSN:0732-183X
-
Container-title:Journal of Clinical Oncology
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:JCO
Author:
Abrams Jeffrey1, Aisner Joseph1, Cirrincione Constance1, Berry Donald A.1, Muss Hyman B.1, Cooper M. Robert1, Henderson I. Craig1, Panasci Lawrence1, Kirshner Jeffrey1, Ellerton John1, Norton Larry1
Affiliation:
1. From the University of Maryland Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD; Cancer and Leukemia Group B Statistical Office, Durham, NC; Bowman Gray School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; McGill Cancer Center, Montreal, Canada; State University of New York at Syracuse, Syracuse, NY; University of California at San Diego, San Diego, CA; and the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To investigate whether dose escalation of megestrol acetate (MA) improves response rate and survival in comparison with standard doses of MA. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three hundred sixty-eight patients with metastatic breast cancer, positive and/or unknown estrogen and progesterone receptors, zero or one prior trial of hormonal therapy, and no prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease were prospectively randomized into three groups. The groups of patients received either MA 160 mg/d (one tablet per day), MA 800 mg/d (five tablets per day), or MA 1,600 mg/d (10 tablets per day). RESULTS: Patient characteristics were well balanced in the three treatment groups. Three hundred sixty-six patients received treatment and were included in the analyses. The response rates were 23%, 27%, and 27% for the 160-mg, 800-mg, and 1,600-mg arms, respectively. Response duration correlated inversely with dose. Median durations of response were 17 months, 14 months, and 8 months for the 160-mg, 800-mg, and 1,600-mg arms, respectively. No significant differences in the treatment arms were noted for time to disease progression or for survival; survival medians were 28 months (low dose), 24 months (mid dose) and 29 months (high dose). The most frequent and troublesome toxicity, weight gain, was dose-related, with approximately 20% of patients on the two higher-dose arms reporting weight gain of more than 20% of their prestudy weight, compared with only 2% in the 160-mg dose arm. CONCLUSION: With a median follow-up of 8 years, these results demonstrate no advantage for dose escalation of MA in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer.
Publisher
American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
Subject
Cancer Research,Oncology
Reference28 articles.
1. Haller DG, Glick JH: Progestational agents in advanced breast cancer: An overview. Semin Oncol 13:2,1986-8, (suppl 4) 2. Schacter L, Rozencweig M, Canetta R, et al: Megestrol acetate: Clinical experience. Cancer Treat Rev 16:49,1989-63, 3. Allegra JC, Kiefer SM: Mechanisms of action of progestational agents. Semin Oncol 12:3,1985-5, (suppl 1) 4. Lundgren S, Kvinnsland S, Varhaug JE, et al: The influence of progestins on receptor levels in breast cancer metastasis. Anticancer Res 7:119,1987-124, 5. Alexieva-Figusch J, Blankenstrin MA, Hop WCJ, et al: Treatment of metastatic breast cancer patients with different dosages of megestrol acetate: Dose relations, metabolic, and endocrine effects. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol 20:30,1984-40,
Cited by
42 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|