More Versus Less Therapy for Older Adults With Acute Myeloid Leukemia: New Perspectives on an Old Debate

Abstract

Most patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are at least age 65 and continue to have short survival, with many patients receiving no specific anti-AML therapy, particularly if they are older than age 75. Although consensus regarding optimal treatment of this growing population is lacking, treatment options are expanding even for the oldest patients. A fundamental question when seeing an older patient with AML is whether to recommend “more intensive” or “less intensive” induction therapy. Existing data can support more intensive treatment strategies for selected older adults, although there is growing evidence to support less intensive therapies as well. Randomized trials to provide clear comparisons between treatment strategies among well-characterized older adult populations are lacking. Reliance on age alone to determine treatment choice is problematic, as “fitness” or “unfitness” varies dramatically among patients of the same chronologic age and remains poorly characterized in existing studies. This article will provide differing perspectives on the “more” versus “less” question, with particular attention to recent drug approvals. Issues relevant to both treatment decision-making in practice and alternative trial design to inform gaps in knowledge will be discussed. Given the heterogeneity, an important conclusion will be that there is unlikely to be a single best approach and that appropriate decision-making requires considerations of many factors specific to individual patients.