Affiliation:
1. From the Department of Medicine, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY; RAND Corporation, Pittsburgh, PA; University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Duke Comprehensive Cancer Center and the Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between socioeconomic status (SES) and the use of intentionally reduced doses of chemotherapy in the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer. Patients and Methods Patients with breast cancer treated with a standard chemotherapy regimen (n = 764) were enrolled in a prospective registry after signing informed consent. Detailed information was collected on patient, disease, and treatment, including chemotherapy doses. Zip code level data on median household income, proportion of people living below the poverty level, and educational attainment were obtained from the US Census. Doses for the first cycle of chemotherapy lower than 85% of standard were considered to be reduced. Univariate analyses and multivariate logistic regression were performed to identify factors associated with the use of reduced first cycle doses. Results In univariate analysis, individual education attainment, zip code SES measures, body mass index, and geographic region were all significantly associated with receipt of intentionally reduced doses of chemotherapy. In multivariate analysis, controlling for geography, factors independently associated with reduced doses were obesity (odds ratio [OR], 2.47; 95% CI, 1.36 to 4.51), severe obesity (OR, 4.04; 95% CI, 1.46 to 11.19), and education less than high school (OR, 3.07; 95% CI, 1.57 to 5.99). Conclusion Social disparities in breast cancer outcomes may be in part the result of lower quality chemotherapy doses in the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer. Efforts to address such prescribing patterns may help reduce SES disparities in breast cancer survival.
Publisher
American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
Reference68 articles.
1. Survival of Breast Cancer Patients in Connecticut in Relation to Socioeconomic and Health Care Access Indicators
2. Kogevinas M, Porta M: Socioeconomic differences in cancer survival: A review of the evidence. IARC Sci Publ 138:177,1997-206,
3. Auvinen A, Karjalainen S: Possible explanations for social class differences in cancer patient survival. IARC Sci Publ 138:377,1997-397,
4. Race, Socioeconomic Status, and Breast Cancer Treatment and Survival
5. Reynolds P, Boyd PT, Blacklow RS, et al: The relationship between social ties and survival among black and white breast cancer patients: National Cancer Institute Black/White Cancer Survival Study Group. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 3:253,1994-259,
Cited by
106 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献