Systemic effect of intrathecal methotrexate during the initial phase of treatment of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Children's Leukemia Cooperative Group.

Abstract

PURPOSE The in vivo response to prephase corticosteroid therapy for 1 week has been described as a major prognostic factor in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Patients with less than 1,000 blasts/microL at day 8 are considered responders and have a better prognosis. This prephase therapy is usually considered as an evaluation of glucocorticoid sensitivity. In fact, it also includes one intrathecal (IT) injection of methotrexate (MTX). In this study, we try to clarify the influence of this injection of IT MTX on the response to the prephase therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS This retrospective study analyzed the response to prephase therapy in 1,044 children with ALL entered onto the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) trial 58881 of the Children's Leukemia Cooperative Group (CLCG). Analysis was restricted to 732 cases with an initial blast count greater than 1,000/microL. The following variables were tested to analyze response to prephase therapy: age, sex, evaluated risk factor (RF), blast count on day 0, actual dose of prednisolone administered, immunophenotype (T v non-T), and day of IT MTX. For statistical analysis, the variable day of IT MTX (D) was stratified into three groups: group 1 if D less than 2, group 2 if D > or = 2 but < or = 6, and group 3 if D greater than 6. RESULTS All variables tested had a significant influence on response to the prephase therapy. This was especially true for IT MTX: 90.4% responders in group 1, 76.9% in group 2, and 70% in group 3 (P < .001). Immunophenotype was also a major predictor of response to the prephase: 88% responders in B-lineage ALL versus 56.2% in T-lineage ALL. IT MTX had a significant influence in B-lineage ALL (96% responders in group 1, 90% in group 2, and 79% in group 3; P < .001), whereas the influence could not be detected in T-lineage ALL. CONCLUSION These results clearly demonstrate a therapeutic systemic effect of low doses of IT MTX in childhood ALL, and response to prephase therapy should not be considered as an in vivo test for cortico-sensitivity only. Earlier use of IT MTX leads to a higher percentage of responders.