Phase III Randomized Trial of Docetaxel Plus Cisplatin Versus Vindesine Plus Cisplatin in Patients With Stage IV Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: The Japanese Taxotere Lung Cancer Study Group

Author:

Kubota Kaoru1,Watanabe Koshiro1,Kunitoh Hideo1,Noda Kazumasa1,Ichinose Yukito1,Katakami Nobuyuki1,Sugiura Takahiko1,Kawahara Masaaki1,Yokoyama Akira1,Yokota Soichiro1,Yoneda Shuichi1,Matsui Kaoru1,Kudo Shinzo1,Shibuya Masahiko1,Isobe Takeshi1,Segawa Yoshihiko1,Nishiwaki Yutaka1,Ohashi Yasuo1,Niitani Hisanobu1

Affiliation:

1. From the National Cancer Center Hospital E, Kashiwa; Yokohama Municipal Citizen’s Hospital; Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama; National Cancer Center Hospital; Nippon Medical School; Tokyo University; Tokyo Cooperative Oncology Group, Tokyo; National Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka; Kobe City General Hospital, Kobe; Aichi Cancer Center, Nagoya; National Kinki Central Hospital for Chest Disease, Sakai; Niigata Cancer Center, Niigata; Toneyama National Hospital, Toyonaka; Saitama Cancer Center, Kitaadachi;...

Abstract

Purpose Few randomized trials have demonstrated survival benefit of combination chemotherapy involving new agents plus cisplatin compared with classic combination chemotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The primary aim of this study was to test whether docetaxel plus cisplatin (DC) improves survival compared with vindesine plus cisplatin (VdsC) in patients with previously untreated stage IV NSCLC. Patients and Methods Eligible, stage IV, chemotherapy-naive patients (n = 311) were randomly assigned to receive docetaxel 60 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1 plus cisplatin 80 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1 of a 3- or 4-week cycle, or vindesine 3 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1, 8, and 15 plus cisplatin 80 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1 of a 4-week cycle. Cross-over administration of docetaxel and vindesine was prohibited for both treatment groups. Results Overall, 302 patients were eligible for evaluation. The DC arm demonstrated significant improvements compared with the VdsC arm in overall response rates (37% v 21%, respectively; P < .01) and median survival times (11.3 v 9.6 months, respectively; P = .014). Two-year survival rates were 24% for the DC arm compared with 12% for the VdsC arm. The physical domain of the Quality of Life for Cancer Patients Treated with Anticancer Drugs measure was significantly better in the DC arm than in the VdsC arm (P = .020). Toxicity was predominantly hematologic and was more severe in the VdsC arm. Conclusion As first-line treatment for stage IV NSCLC, DC resulted in greater clinical benefit in terms of response rate (with marked improvements in overall and 2-year survival rates) and quality of life than did treatment with VdsC.

Publisher

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3