Estrogen and Progesterone Receptor Testing in Breast Cancer: ASCO/CAP Guideline Update

Author:

Allison Kimberly H.1,Hammond M. Elizabeth H.2,Dowsett Mitchell3,McKernin Shannon E.4,Carey Lisa A.5,Fitzgibbons Patrick L.6,Hayes Daniel F.7,Lakhani Sunil R.89,Chavez-MacGregor Mariana10,Perlmutter Jane11,Perou Charles M.5,Regan Meredith M.12,Rimm David L.13,Symmans W. Fraser10,Torlakovic Emina E.1415,Varella Leticia16,Viale Giuseppe1718,Weisberg Tracey F.19,McShane Lisa M.20,Wolff Antonio C.21

Affiliation:

1. Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA

2. Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City, UT

3. Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom

4. American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA

5. University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC

6. St Jude Medical Center, Fullerton, CA

7. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI

8. University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

9. Pathology Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

10. MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

11. Gemini Group, Ann Arbor, MI

12. Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA

13. Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT

14. Saskatchewan Health Authority, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada

15. University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada

16. Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY

17. IEO, European Institute of Oncology, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Milan, Italy

18. University of Milan, Milan, Italy

19. Maine Center for Cancer Medicine, Scarborough, ME

20. National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD

21. Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD

Abstract

PURPOSETo update key recommendations of the American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists estrogen (ER) and progesterone receptor (PgR) testing in breast cancer guideline.METHODSA multidisciplinary international Expert Panel was convened to update the clinical practice guideline recommendations informed by a systematic review of the medical literature.RECOMMENDATIONSThe Expert Panel continues to recommend ER testing of invasive breast cancers by validated immunohistochemistry as the standard for predicting which patients may benefit from endocrine therapy, and no other assays are recommended for this purpose. Breast cancer samples with 1% to 100% of tumor nuclei positive should be interpreted as ER positive. However, the Expert Panel acknowledges that there are limited data on endocrine therapy benefit for cancers with 1% to 10% of cells staining ER positive. Samples with these results should be reported using a new reporting category, ER Low Positive, with a recommended comment. A sample is considered ER negative if < 1% or 0% of tumor cell nuclei are immunoreactive. Additional strategies recommended to promote optimal performance, interpretation, and reporting of cases with an initial low to no ER staining result include establishing a laboratory-specific standard operating procedure describing additional steps used by the laboratory to confirm/adjudicate results. The status of controls should be reported for cases with 0% to 10% staining. Similar principles apply to PgR testing, which is used primarily for prognostic purposes in the setting of an ER-positive cancer. Testing of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) for ER is recommended to determine potential benefit of endocrine therapies to reduce risk of future breast cancer, while testing DCIS for PgR is considered optional. Additional information can be found at www.asco.org/breast-cancer-guidelines .

Publisher

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3