A randomized phase III trial of systemic therapy plus early local therapy versus systemic therapy alone in women with de novo stage IV breast cancer: A trial of the ECOG-ACRIN Research Group (E2108).

Author:

Khan Seema Ahsan1,Zhao Fengmin2,Solin Lawrence J.3,Goldstein Lori J.4,Cella David5,Basik Mark6,Golshan Mehra7,Julian Thomas B.8,Pockaj Barbara A.9,Lee Christine A10,Razaq Wajeeha11,Sparano Joseph A.12,Babiera Gildy V13,Dy Irene Ang14,Jain Sarika15,Silverman Paula16,Fisher Carla17,Tevaarwerk Amye Juliet18,Wagner Lynne I.19,Sledge George W.20

Affiliation:

1. Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, IL;

2. Dana–Farber Cancer Institute, Malden, MA;

3. Albert Einstein Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA;

4. Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA;

5. Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL;

6. McGill University, Jewish General Hospital Segal Cancer Centre, Montréal, QC, Canada;

7. Brigham and Women's Hospital and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA;

8. NRG Oncology, and The Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA;

9. Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ;

10. Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, WA;

11. NSABP Foundation and Peggy and Charles Stephenson Oklahoma Cancer Center, Oklahoma City, OK;

12. Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine/Albert Einstein Cancer Center, Bronx, NY;

13. University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX;

14. St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital, Effingham, IL;

15. Northwestern University Division of Hematology/Oncology, Chicago, IL;

16. University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH;

17. Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN;

18. University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, WI;

19. Wake Forest University Health Sciences, Winston Salem, NC;

20. Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA;

Abstract

LBA2 Background: About 6% of newly diagnosed breast cancer patients present with Stage IV disease and an intact primary tumor (IPT). Locoregional treatment (LRT) for the IPT is hypothesized to improve survival based on retrospective analyses, but randomized trials have provided conflicting data. We now report the results of E2108, a Phase 3 trial that examined the worth of LRT for the IPT following initial systemic therapy. Methods: Stage IV patients with IPT were registered, treated with optimal systemic therapy (OST) based on patient and tumor characteristics; those who did not progress during 4-8 months of OST were randomized to LRT for the IPT, or no LRT. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), with locoregional disease control as a secondary endpoint. Stratified log rank test and Cox proportional hazard model were used to compare OS between treatment groups. Cumulative incidence of locoregional recurrence/progression was estimated and Gray test was used for treatment group comparisons. The trial was designed to detect an improvement in 3 year OS rate from 30% with OST alone to 49.3% for OST+LRT (power 95%, 1-sided alpha 0.05) with full information expected after 152 deaths; the data monitoring committee recommended data release after 80% of full information. Results: 390 patients were enrolled between 2/8/11 and 7/23/15, and received OST. Of these, 256 eligible patients were randomized to either continued OST alone (N = 131) or OST+LRT (N = 125).There were 121 deaths and 43 locoregional progression events after a median follow up 59 months (range: 0-91). There was no significant difference in OS (3-year OS rate 68.4% in OST+LRT vs. 67.9% OST alone arm, stratified log-rank p = 0.63, HR = 1.09, 90% CI: 0.80, 1.49) or in progression-free survival (p = 0.40). The locoregional recurrence/progression was significantly higher in the OST alone arm (3-year rate 25.6% vs 10.2%, Gray test p = 0.003). Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) measured by FACT-B Trial Outcome Index was significantly worse in the OST+LRT arm than OST alone arm at 18 months post randomization (60% completion, Wilcoxon rank sum test p = 0.01), but no difference was observed at time points 6 months (74% completion) or 30 months (56% completion). Conclusions: Early local therapy does not improve survival in patients with de novo metastatic breast cancer and an IPT. Although there was a 2.5-fold higher risk of local disease progression without LRT, LRT of the IPT did not lead to improved HRQOL. Clinical trial information: NCT01242800 .

Funder

Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group

Publisher

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3