Selumetinib in Combination With Dacarbazine in Patients With Metastatic Uveal Melanoma: A Phase III, Multicenter, Randomized Trial (SUMIT)
-
Published:2018-04-20
Issue:12
Volume:36
Page:1232-1239
-
ISSN:0732-183X
-
Container-title:Journal of Clinical Oncology
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:JCO
Author:
Carvajal Richard D.1, Piperno-Neumann Sophie1, Kapiteijn Ellen1, Chapman Paul B.1, Frank Stephen1, Joshua Anthony M.1, Piulats Josep M.1, Wolter Pascal1, Cocquyt Veronique1, Chmielowski Bartosz1, Evans T.R. Jeffry1, Gastaud Lauris1, Linette Gerald1, Berking Carola1, Schachter Jacob1, Rodrigues Manuel J.1, Shoushtari Alexander N.1, Clemett Delyth1, Ghiorghiu Dana1, Mariani Gabriella1, Spratt Shirley1, Lovick Susan1, Barker Peter1, Kilgour Elaine1, Lai Zhongwu1, Schwartz Gary K.1, Nathan Paul1
Affiliation:
1. Richard D. Carvajal and Gary K. Schwartz, Columbia University Medical Center; Paul B. Chapman and Alexander N. Shoushtari, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Sophie Piperno-Neumann and Manuel J. Rodrigues, Institut Curie, Paris; Lauris Gastaud, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Nice, France; Ellen Kapiteijn, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands; Stephen Frank, Hebrew University Hadassah Medical School – The Sharett Institute of Oncology, Jerusalem; Jacob Schachter, Sheba...
Abstract
Purpose Uveal melanoma is the most common primary intraocular malignancy in adults with no effective systemic treatment option in the metastatic setting. Selumetinib (AZD6244, ARRY-142886) is an oral, potent, and selective MEK1/2 inhibitor with a short half-life, which demonstrated single-agent activity in patients with metastatic uveal melanoma in a randomized phase II trial. Methods The Selumetinib (AZD6244: ARRY-142886) (Hyd-Sulfate) in Metastatic Uveal Melanoma (SUMIT) study was a phase III, double-blind trial ( ClinicalTrial.gov identifier: NCT01974752) in which patients with metastatic uveal melanoma and no prior systemic therapy were randomly assigned (3:1) to selumetinib (75 mg twice daily) plus dacarbazine (1,000 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1 of every 21-day cycle) or placebo plus dacarbazine. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) by blinded independent central radiologic review. Secondary end points included overall survival and objective response rate. Results A total of 129 patients were randomly assigned to receive selumetinib plus dacarbazine (n = 97) or placebo plus dacarbazine (n = 32). In the selumetinib plus dacarbazine group, 82 patients (85%) experienced a PFS event, compared with 24 (75%) in the placebo plus dacarbazine group (median, 2.8 v 1.8 months); the hazard ratio for PFS was 0.78 (95% CI, 0.48 to 1.27; two-sided P = .32). The objective response rate was 3% with selumetinib plus dacarbazine and 0% with placebo plus dacarbazine (two-sided P = .36). At 37% maturity (n = 48 deaths), analysis of overall survival gave a hazard ratio of 0.75 (95% CI, 0.39 to 1.46; two-sided P = .40). The most frequently reported adverse events (selumetinib plus dacarbazine v placebo plus dacarbazine) were nausea (62% v 19%), rash (57% v 6%), fatigue (44% v 47%), diarrhea (44% v 22%), and peripheral edema (43% v 6%). Conclusion In patients with metastatic uveal melanoma, the combination of selumetinib plus dacarbazine had a tolerable safety profile but did not significantly improve PFS compared with placebo plus dacarbazine.
Publisher
American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
Subject
Cancer Research,Oncology
Cited by
226 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|