Looking on the bright side reduces worry in pregnancy: Training interpretations in pregnant women

Author:

Hirsch Colette R.ORCID,Meeten Frances,Newby Jill M.,O’Halloran Sophie,Gordon Calum,Krzyzanowski Hannah,Moulds Michelle L.

Abstract

Background

Recent evidence suggests that anxiety is more common than depression in the perinatal period, however there are few interventions available to treat perinatal anxiety. Targeting specific processes that maintain anxiety, such as worry, may be one potentially promising way to reduce anxiety in this period. Given evidence that negative interpretation bias maintains worry, we tested whether interpretation bias could be modified, and whether this in turn would lead to less negative thought (i.e., worry) intrusions, in pregnant women with high levels of worry.

Method

Participants (N = 49, at least 16 weeks gestation) were randomly assigned to either an interpretation modification condition (CBM-I) which involved training in accessing positive meanings of emotionally ambiguous scenarios, or an active control condition in which the scenarios remained ambiguous and unresolved.

Results

Relative to the control condition, participants in the CBM-I condition generated significantly more positive interpretations and experienced significantly less negative thought intrusions.

Conclusions

Our findings indicate that worry is a modifiable risk factor during pregnancy, and that it is possible to induce a positive interpretation bias in pregnant women experiencing high levels of worry. Although preliminary, our findings speak to exciting clinical possibilities for the treatment of worry and the prevention of perinatal anxiety.

Publisher

Leibniz Institute for Psychology (ZPID)

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Clinical Psychology

Reference48 articles.

1. HirschC. R.MeetenF.NewbyJ. M.O’HalloranS.GordonC.KrzyzanowskiH.MouldsM. L. (2018). Cognitive Bias Modification for Interpretation (CBM-I) to reduce worry in pregnant women[Preregistration]. OSF. https://osf.io/ye84g

2. Austin, M. P., Highet, N., & the Expert Working Group. (2017). Mental health care in the perinatal period: Australian clinical practice guideline. Melbourne, Australia: Centre of Perinatal Excellence.

3. Borkovec, T. D. (1994). The nature, functions, and origins of worry. In G. C. L. Davey & F. Tallis (Eds.), Worrying: Perspectives on theory, assessment and treatment (pp. 5-33). Oxford, United Kingdom: John Wiley and Sons.

4. Psychometric properties of the Penn state worry questionnaire in a clinical anxiety disorders sample

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3