Abstract
The phenomenon of violent radicalism/extremism is portrayed as a consequence of a mechanism that fosters extremism in general. This is the process of motivational imbalance or “prepossession”, a state wherein a given need becomes dominant to the point of inhibiting other needs. In the case of violent extremism, the dominant need is the quest for significance, the desire to matter and have self and others’ respect. Whereas the “hydraulic” domination-inhibition process that underlies extremism can be observed across levels of phylogeny, the motivational imbalance in those cases is typically brief in duration. In the case of humans, however, participation in violent extremism can be long lasting, due to its facilitation by a compelling narrative” that ties violence to the attainment of significance, and is embraced by a “network” of trusted others (individuals’ friends and relatives) who validate the narrative and bestow significance on individuals who implement its dictates.
Publisher
Leibniz Institute for Psychology (ZPID)
Reference61 articles.
1. Optogenetics, Sex, and Violence in the Brain: Implications for Psychiatry
2. Anderson, M. C., & Huddleston, E. (2012). Towards a cognitive and neurobiological model of motivated forgetting. In R. F. Belli (Ed.), True and false recovered memories (pp. 53-120). New York, NY, USA: Springer.
3. Bjørgo, T. (2002). Exit neo-Nazism: Reducing recruitment and promoting disengagement from racist groups (Working paper, Norsk Utenrik-spolitisk Institutt, Oslo, Norway). Retrieved from https://brage.bibsys.no/xmlui/handle/11250/2394077
4. A prospective study of predictors of relapse in anorexia nervosa: Implications for relapse prevention
5. Multifinality in implicit choice.
Cited by
14 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献