Abstract
Abstract
Borges’ works deconstruct the time lag conceived in the binaries such as the work’s production vs. its criticism, the original text
vs. its translation, the source text vs. the derivative nature of the target text, and reality vs. fiction. Benjamin, as Borges’
near contemporary, echoes rather the same idea in his post-Nietzschean philosophy of translation. Focusing on the similarities
between the views of Benjamin on translation and those of Borges as reflected in his stories as well as his essays, particularly
in his well-received essay on translations of Thousand and One Nights and in his meta-fictional short story
‘Pierre Menard’: Author of the Quixote, this paper aims at bringing the two scholars together in the context
of literary translation studies in the postmodern era, where intersemiotic and intertextual collage (in Eco’s terminology) and
mimicry bear witness to the claim that translation, like other intertextual enterprises, is neither inferior to the other
intertextual undertakings such as writing, nor is it detached from language as post-structurally conceived. Furthermore, another
core objective of this study is to show how Borges’ ‘Menard’ heralds and truly represents the translation
theories built upon the underlying assumptions of deconstructionism since the 1980s. It is concluded that as far as postmodern and
poststructuralist theories are concerned, both Borges’ and Benjamin’s works had predicted the future of literary and translation
theories in which the decisive role of translation and translator in the construction of culture and identities cannot be
denied.
Publisher
John Benjamins Publishing Company
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Communication,Language and Linguistics