Affiliation:
1. Faculty of Education in Science and Technology, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 3200003, Israel
2. Samuel Neaman Institute, Haifa 3200003, Israel
Abstract
Content knowledge (CK), pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) and, assessment knowledge (AK) are fundamental types of teachers’ knowledge. Second-career, pre-service chemistry teachers leave the industry and return to the Technion to study in the Views program to obtain a high school teaching certificate. Their background can potentially contribute to higher quality of science teaching and learning in general and of chemistry teaching in particular. We investigated how pre-service chemistry teachers’ knowledge develops as they are exposed to chemistry context-based learning, and what differences are there between pre- and in-service teachers’ knowledge types and their self-efficacy. The participants were 25 second-career pre-service teachers and 29 in-service chemistry teachers who served as a comparison group. The teachers’ professional growth was examined by assessing their CK, PCK, AK, and self-efficacy by using three questionnaires that included adapted scientific articles on energy, acid-base, and oxidation-reduction in the context of sustainability. Five expert chemistry teachers validated the questionnaires. We found that all three knowledge types of the pre-service teachers improved during the course and they became more aware of sustainable chemistry issues than the in-service teachers. The study contributes to chemistry education by narrowing the gap that exists in the literature between chemistry teachers’ PCK and AK on the one hand and self-efficacy on the other hand. We offer an assessment tool for identifying and quantifying teachers’ knowledge. We offer recommendations for science educators about the needs, strengths, and weaknesses of pre- and in-service teachers related to teaching sustainable chemistry.
Publisher
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
Subject
Education,Chemistry (miscellaneous)
Reference96 articles.
1. Abell R. A., Olson D. M., Dinerstein E., Eichbaum W., Hurley P., Diggs J. T., … and Taylor C. L., (2000), Freshwater ecoregions of North America: a conservation assessment , Island Press, vol. 2
2. Abell S. K. and Siegel M. A., (2011), Assessment literacy: What science teachers need to know and be able to do, The Professional Knowledge Base of Science Teaching , Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 205–221
3. ABET, (2018), Criteria for accrediting engineering programs, 2018-2019 , Baltimore: ABET, Accessed August 4, 2018, http://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-programs-2018-2019/
4. Affeldt F., Tolppanen S., Aksela M. and Eilks I., (2017), The potential of the non-formal educational sector for supporting chemistry learning and sustainability education for all students–a joint perspective from two cases in Finland and Germany. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. , 18 (1), 13–25
5. Akiri E., Tal M., Peretz R., Dori D. and Dori Y. J., (2020), STEM Graduate Students' Systems Thinking, Modeling and Scientific Understanding–The Case of Food Production. Appl. Sci. , 10 (21), 7417
Cited by
17 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献