Author:
Schramm Júnior José Eneas,Oliveira Gabriela S.,Santos Tamires B.,Santos Gilberto Marcos de M.
Abstract
The emergence of graph theory allowed using the complex network approach to aggregate detailed information about interactions between species. Although the use of the complex network approach has improved the understanding about community structuring, few aspects such as the temporal variation in the species’ activity pattern in the networks’ topology were explored so far. The current study used the ecological network approach to investigate ants interacting in the extrafloral nectary (EFN) of plants in order to test the hypothesis that the temporal variation in the foraging behavior of these animals affects the networks’ topology. In order to assess the temporal effect on the interaction networks, 24-hour collections divided in two 12-hour shifts (day and night) were performed in 20 plots, thus totaling 288 collection hours over 6 months. The ant-plant interaction networks presented similarity among the topological metrics assessed throughout the day. Different ant species presented distinct foraging times. Thus, two modules referring to the day and night shifts emerged from the network and presented specific species at each foraging shift. On the other hand, the plants kept on providing the resource (active EFNs) throughout the day. The results found in the current study have shown that ecological networks keep their structures constant; however, the ecological processes ruling these networks can better respond to the effects caused, for example, by the temporal variation in species’ activity. Therefore, it is worth always taking into consideration the importance of ecological processes at the time to analyze interactions in the nature.
Publisher
Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana
Reference52 articles.
1. Agosti, D., Majer, J.D., Alonso, L.E. & Schultz, T.R. (2000). Ants: standard methods for measuring and monitoring biodiversity. Smithsonian Institution Press. Washington. 280 p.
2. Allesina, S. & Levine, J.M. (2011). A competitive network theory of species diversity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108: 5638-5642.
3. Almeida-Neto, M., Guimarães, P., Guimarães, J.P.R., Loyola, R.D., Ulrich, W., Guimarães, P.R.J., Loyota, R.D. & Ulrich, W. (2008). A consistent metric for nestedness analysis in ecological systems: reconciling concept and measurement. Oikos, 117: 1227-1239.
4. Amaral, L.A.N. & Ottino, J.M. (2004). Complex networks: Augmenting the framework for the study of complex systems. European Physical Journal B, 38: 147-162.
5. Araujo, M.S., Guimarães, P.R., Svanback, R., Pinheiro, A., Guimaraes, P., dos Reis, S.F. & Bolnick, D.I. (2008). Network Analysis reveals contrasting effects of intraspecific competition on individuals vs. population diets. Ecology, 89: 1193-1981.