CALCULATION OF THE RESULTING RANKING OF ALTERNATIVES BASED ON THE USE OF INCOMPLETE EXPERT RANKINGS

Author:

,Hnatienko HryhoriiORCID,Kruglov AlexanderORCID, ,Tmenova NataliaORCID,

Abstract

Incomplete information is a characteristic feature of organizational systems. Incomplete data accompanies the decision-maker in all components of corporate security, namely the management of the organization, staff activities, company assets, implemented business processes, information and other resources, financial resources, used technologies, the company's reputation, etc. Nevertheless, a reasonable decision should be made. In particular, a common practical task is to rank alternatives of different nature. This is done by experts of high competence within the areas of responsibility. Naturally, there is a situation of decision-making with incomplete data, on the basis of which it is necessary to find a complete resulting ranking of alternatives, which best approximates the information obtained from experts, ie is in some sense closest to the given incomplete expert rankings. In order to compare different ways to achieve the resulting ranking of alternatives, the formalization of the problem in the classes of single-criteria and multicriteria models for the metrics of Cook, Heming, Euclid and Litvak is considered. To solve the problems that arise in a situation of incomplete information, a number of heuristics that are empirical methodological rules that help to find solutions and contribute to the definition of mathematically incorrect problems are introduced. The notion of the modified Litvak median and the Litvak compromise median, which is used using the minimax criterion, is introduced. The algorithms developed by the authors for determining the medians of expert rankings of alternatives, namely the genetic algorithm and the heuristic algorithm are described. To illustrate the results the schemes of the genetic algorithm are given. The main results of the application of the described algorithms, which illustrate the efficiency of their application to ranking problems, that are characterized by incomplete information are given.

Publisher

Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv

Reference19 articles.

1. 1. О.Ф. Волошин, Г.М. Гнатієнко, О.В. Дробот, "Метод косвенного определения интервалов весовых коэффициентов параметров для метризованных отношений между объектами", Проблемы управления и информатики, №2, С.34-41, 2003.

2. 2. Г.М. Гнатієнко, В.Є. Снитюк В.Є., Експертні техно логії прийняття рішень, ТОВ "Маклаут", Київ, 2008. - 444 с.

3. 3. A. Dodonov, D. Lande, V. Tsyganok, O. Andriichuk, S. Kadenko, A. Graivoronskaya (2019). Information Operations Recognition. From Nonlinear Analysis to Decision-Making, Lambert Academic Publishing, 2019, 275 p.

4. 4. С.В. Каденко, В.В. Циганок, О.В. Андрійчук, О.В. Карабчук, "Аналіз інструментарію підтримки прийняття рі шень у контексті вирішення задач стратегічного плануван ня", Реєстрація, зберігання і обробка даних, Т. 22, № 2, С.77-91, 2020.

5. 5. О.Ф. Волошин, С.О. Мащенко, Теорія прийняття рішень: Навчальний посібник, Видавничо-поліграфічний центр "Київський університет", Київ, 2006, 304 с.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3