Affiliation:
1. National Medical Research Center of Traumatology and Orthopedics of N.N. Priorov
2. Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology
Abstract
Revision interventions due to aseptic instability show a marked upward trend, and one of the reasons is an increase in the number of people with osteoporosis in the population. The impaired bone metabolism in these cases persist even after re-endoprosthetics. The authors aim to draw attention of trauma orthopaedists to the need to treat osteoporosis either before or immediately after the re-endoprosthetic surgery. A clinical case is presented. A 65-year-old patient T., 5 months after surgery, complained of persistent pain in the left hip joint radiating to the left knee joint, which intensified when walking, lameness, inability to move without additional support (two crutches), limited range of motion within the left hip joint that had undergone surgery (endoprosthesis). The patient had a history of femoral neck fracture associated with a low energy fall. The left hip joint re-endoprosthetics was performed due to aseptic instability of the femoral and acetabular components of the prosthetic implant. The diagnosed diseases included secondary osteoporosis, D-deficiency, hypocalcemia, and periprosthetic osteolysis. Given the increased intensity of resorption and the fact that the femoral neck fracture occurred with underlying secondary osteoporosis, it was decided to prescribe antiresorptive therapy with denosumab 60 mg once every 6 months combined with alfacalcidol and calcium supplement. Despite an objective 3-month delay in antiresorptive therapy initiation, the treatment result was achieved in the observed patient. In summary, denosumab 60 mg increases the effectiveness of re-endoprosthetics with underlying osteoporosis by reducing activity of the periprosthetic bone osteolysis.
Reference28 articles.
1. Baker R.P., Squires B., Gargan M.F., Bannister G.C. Total hip arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty in mobile, independent patients with a displaced intracapsular fracture of the femoral neck. A randomized, controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88(12):2583–2589. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.E.01373.
2. Blomfeldt R., Törnkvist H., Ericksson K., Söderqvist A., Ponzer S., Tidermark J. A randomised controlled trial comparing bipolar hemiarthroplasty with total hip replacement for displaced intracapsular fractures of the femoral neck in elderly patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89(2):160–165. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.89B2.18576.
3. Parker M.J., Gurusamy K.S. Arthroplasties (with and without bone cement) for proximal femoral fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;19(3):CD001706. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001706.PUB3.
4. Mironov S.P., Rodionova S.S., Darchiya L.Yu., Maksimov A.A., Panov A.A., Solod E.I. et al. Pathologic fractures complicating osteoporosis: clinical guidelines. 2018. (In Russ.) Available at: https://www.cito-priorov.ru/cito/files/Патологические_переломы_осл_остеопороз.pdf.
5. Kim B.-S., Lim J.-Y., Ha Y.-C. Recent Epidemiology of Hip Fractures in South Korea. Hip Pelvis. 2020;32(3):119. https://doi.org/10.5371/hp.2020.32.3.119.