Features of introducing budgeting for different models of innovation processes: a framework review

Author:

Cherep Alla1ORCID,Gerasymova Vitaliya2ORCID,Gorbunova Anna3ORCID,Shcheblykina Inna3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Doctor of Economics, Professor, Dean of the Faculty of Economics, Zaporizhzhya National University

2. Ph.D. in Economics, Senior Lecturer, Department of Finance, Banking and Insurance, Faculty of Economics, Zaporizhzhya National University

3. Ph.D. in Economics, Associate Professor, Department of Finance, Banking and Insurance, Faculty of Economics, Zaporizhzhya National University

Abstract

Innovation processes are vehicles of growth and, therefore, require effective management systems. These circumstances raise the question of how a particular innovation process model influences the features of budgeting implementation at the enterprise. The article aims to figure out the main provisions, which profoundly impact using budgeting for particular innovation process models. Methodologically, this article reviews theoretical approaches and practical basis on innovation process models and peculiarities of using budgeting in this area. Authoritative sources on these issues and the search covering 43 years were observed. This study was also based upon the secondary research data provided by international institutions, such as consulting companies, which help to reveal theoretical foundations and extensive experience in using budgeting practices on innovative companies around the world. Thus, the following statements were identified: an interconnection between the innovation process model and the creation of business units that become budgeting points; specific innovation process models require stage-based budgeting; particular innovation process models demand greater budgeting flexibility. Investigation of these statements led to the discovery: innovation processes models, which require being closed within business units and others that can demand to be more separated; models that are more in need of milestone budgeting; nature of influence flexibility on the efficiency of innovation. The demonstrated findings on features of using budgeting for particular innovation process models can help executives reconsider the existing systems to increase its efficiency.

Publisher

LLC CPC Business Perspectives

Subject

Strategy and Management,Business and International Management,General Business, Management and Accounting,Information Systems and Management,Law,Sociology and Political Science,Public Administration

Reference44 articles.

1. Andersen, N., Boersch, Dr. A., & Blohmke, Dr. J. (2019). A Deloitte survey on European companies and how digital technologies can strategically enhance innovation. - https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/insights/us/articles/DE_897_Innovation-in-Europe/DI_Innovation-In-Europe.pdf

2. Asogwa, I. E., & Etim, O. E. (2017). Traditional Budgeting in Today’s Business Environment. Journal of Applied Finance & Banking, 7(3), 111-120. - http://www.scienpress.com/Upload/JAFB/Vol%207_3_7.pdf

3. R&D budgets and corporate earnings targets

4. Barsh, J., Capozzi, M., & Mendonca, L. (2007). How companies approach innovation: A McKinsey Global Survey. - https://www.elkarbide.com/sites/default/files/MCKINSEY%20INNOVACI%C3%93N.pdf

5. Connecting technological capabilities with market needs using a cyclic innovation model

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3