Study of Prescribing Pattern and Evaluation of the Efficacy of Monotherapy vs. Polytherapy Antihypertensive Drugs in Diabetes Patients

Author:

Aghili Mina,H.S. ShekarORCID

Abstract

The monitoring pattern of antihypertensive drugs and evaluation of the efficacy of prescribed pharmacological regimen can provide important vision into control of hypertension and prevention of related comorbidities. This study aimed to evaluate prescribing patterns and efficacy of prescribed monotherapy vs. polytherapy antihypertensive drugs in diabetes patients. A hospital-based prospective study was conducted in the medicine department of Kempegowda Institute of Medical Sciences Hospital and Research Center, Bangalore, India for a duration of 12 months. A total of 720 hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus aged = 18 years were included in this study. Ninety patients (31%) were presented with chronic kidney disease, followed by ischemic heart disease (82, 28.3%), stroke (78, 26.9%), and heart failure (40, 13.8%). Monotherapy was prescribed more commonly than polytherapy (60.14% vs. 39.86%). The majority of patients were treated with Calcium channel blockers. In both therapeutic regimens, mono- and polytherapy, amlodipine was found to be the most prescribed drug. Comparison between results of antihypertensive monotherapy and polytherapy regimens (a combination of different classes of antihypertensive drugs) revealed that only prescription of polytherapy was associated with a statistically significant reduction in both systolic and diastolic blood pressure (mean (SD) of systolic blood pressure before polytherapy vs. after polytherapy; 166 (3.2) vs. 139 (1.4), < 0.0001. mean (SD) of diastolic blood pressure before polytherapy vs. after polytherapy; 103 (1.6) vs. 88 (0.5), < 0.0001). Systolic/diastolic blood pressure was not controlled and maintained within a therapeutic goal among patients who received single antihypertensive medication (monotherapy). Therefore, a combination of antihypertensive medications needs to be considered to achieve controlled blood pressure and avoid clinical inertia among hypertensive patients with diabetes. 

Publisher

International Journal of Pharma and Bio Sciences

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3