Abstract
Abstract
Introduction
Dental implantation has emerged as an efficient substitute for missing teeth, which is essential for restoring oral function and aesthetics. Compared to traditional denture repair approaches, dental implants offer better stability and sustainability. The position, angle, and depth of dental implants are crucial factors for their long-term success and necessitate high-precision operation and technical support.
Method
We propose an integrated dual-arm high-precision oral implant surgery navigation positioning system and a corresponding control strategy. Compared with traditional implant robots, the integrated dual-arm design greatly shortens the preparation time before surgery and simplifies the operation process. We propose a novel control flow and module for the proposed structure, including an Occluded Target Tracking Module (OTTM) for occlusion tracking, a Planting Plan Development Module (PPDM) for generating implant plans, and a Path Formulation Module (PFM) for controlling the movement path of the two robot arms.
Result
Under the coordinated control of the aforementioned modules, the robot achieved excellent accuracy in clinical trials. The average angular error and entry point error for five patients who underwent implant surgery using the proposed robot were 2.1° and 0.39 mm, respectively.
Conclusion
In essence, our study introduces an integrated dual-arm high-precision navigation system for oral implant surgery, resolving issues like lengthy preoperative preparation and static surgical planning. Clinical results confirm its efficacy, emphasizing its accuracy and precision in guiding oral implant procedures.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference35 articles.
1. Pandey C, Rokaya D, Bhattarai BP. Contemporary concepts in osseointegration of dental implants: a review. BioMed Res Int. 2022;2022:6170452.
2. Tsolaki IN, Tonsekar PP, Najafi B, Drew HJ, Sullivan AJ, Petrov SD. Comparison of osteotome and conventional drilling techniques for primary implant stability: an in vitro study. J Oral Implantol. 2016;42(4):321–5.
3. Kivovics M, Takacs A, Penzes D, Nemeth O, Mijiritsky E. Accuracy of dental implant placement using augmented reality-based navigation, static computer assisted implant surgery, and the free-hand method: an in vitro study. J Dent. 2022;119:104070.
4. Meenakshi S, Raghunath N, Raju SN, Srividya S, Indira P. Implant stability a key determinant in implant integration. Trends Prosthodont Dent Implantol. 2013;4:28–48.
5. Palmquist A, Shah FA, Emanuelsson L, Omar O, Suska F. A technique for evaluating bone ingrowth into 3d printed, porous ti6al4v implants accurately using x-ray micro-computed tomography and histomorphometry. Micron. 2017;94:1–8.