Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy vs laparoscopic and open retropubic radical prostatectomy: functional outcomes 18 months after diagnosis from a national cohort study in England-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy vs laparoscopic and open retropubic radical prostatectomy: functional outcomes 18 months after diagnosis from a national cohort study in England

Published:2018-01-18 Issue:4 Volume:118 Page:489-494
ISSN:0007-0920
Container-title:British Journal of Cancer
language:en
Short-container-title:Br J Cancer

Author:

Nossiter Julie,Sujenthiran Arunan,Charman Susan C,Cathcart Paul J,Aggarwal Ajay,Payne Heather,Clarke Noel W,van der Meulen Jan

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

Link

http://www.nature.com/articles/bjc2017454.pdf

Reference28 articles.

1. Aggarwal A, Lewis D, Mason M, Purushotham A, Sullivan R, Van der Meulen JH (2017) Effect of patient choice and hospital competition on service configuration and technology adoption within cancer surgery: a national, population-based study. Lancet Oncol 18 (11): 1445–1453.

2. Anandadas CN, Davidson SE, Clarke NW, Brown SC, Logue JP, Gilmore L, Swindell R, Collins GN, O’Reilly PH, Wemyss-Holden GD, Lau MW (2011) Quality of Life in men treated for early prostate cancer: A prospective patient preference cohort study. J Cancer Ther 2 (4): 448–457.

3. Asimakopoulos AD, Pereira Fraga CT, Annino F, Pasqualetti P, Calado AA, Mugnier C (2011) Randomized comparison between laparoscopic and robot–assisted nerve–sparing radical prostatectomy. J Sex Med 8 (5): 1503–1512.

4. Barry MJ, Gallagher PM, Skinner JS, Fowler FJ (2012) Adverse effects of robotic-assisted laparoscopic versus open retropubic radical prostatectomy among a nationwide random sample of medicare-age men. J Clin Oncol 30 (5): 513–518.

5. Donovan JL, Hamdy FC, Lane JA, Mason M, Metcalfe C, Walsh E, Blazeby JM, Peters TJ, Holding P, Bonnington S, Lennon T (2016) Patient-reported outcomes after monitoring, surgery, or radiotherapy for prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 375 (15): 1425–1437.

Cited by 38 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Efficiency and productivity gains of robotic surgery: The case of the English National Health Service;Health Economics;2024-05-11

2. Quality of life after robotic versus conventional minimally invasive cancer surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis;Journal of Robotic Surgery;2024-04-10

3. What can patient-reported experience measures tell us about the variation in patients’ experience of prostate cancer care? A cross-sectional study using survey data from the National Prostate Cancer Audit in England;BMJ Open;2024-02

4. Comparative Effectiveness of Robot-Assisted Prostatectomy Versus Open Surgery: A High Dimensional Propensity Score Matched Cohort Study in a Nationwide Claims Database;2024

5. EQ-5D studies in robotic surgery: a mini-review;2023 IEEE 17th International Symposium on Applied Computational Intelligence and Informatics (SACI);2023-05-23