Accelerating development of high-risk neuroblastoma patient-derived xenograft models for preclinical testing and personalised therapy
-
Published:2020-01-10
Issue:5
Volume:122
Page:680-691
-
ISSN:0007-0920
-
Container-title:British Journal of Cancer
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Br J Cancer
Author:
Kamili Alvin, Gifford Andrew J., Li Nancy, Mayoh Chelsea, Chow Shu-Oi, Failes Timothy W., Eden Georgina L., Cadiz Roxanne, Xie Jinhan, Lukeis Robyn E., Norris Murray D., Haber Michelle, McCowage Geoffrey B., Arndt Greg M., Trahair Toby N.ORCID, Fletcher Jamie I.ORCID
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Predictive preclinical models play an important role in the assessment of new treatment strategies and as avatar models for personalised medicine; however, reliable and timely model generation is challenging. We investigated the feasibility of establishing patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models of high-risk neuroblastoma from a range of tumour-bearing patient materials and assessed approaches to improve engraftment efficiency.
Methods
PDX model development was attempted in NSG mice by using tumour materials from 12 patients, including primary and metastatic solid tumour samples, bone marrow, pleural fluid and residual cells from cytogenetic analysis. Subcutaneous, intramuscular and orthotopic engraftment were directly compared for three patients.
Results
PDX models were established for 44% (4/9) of patients at diagnosis and 100% (5/5) at relapse. In one case, attempted engraftment from pleural fluid resulted in an EBV-associated atypical lymphoid proliferation. Xenogeneic graft versus host disease was observed with attempted engraftment from lymph node and bone marrow tumour samples but could be prevented by T-cell depletion. Orthotopic engraftment was more efficient than subcutaneous or intramuscular engraftment.
Conclusions
High-risk neuroblastoma PDX models can be reliably established from diverse sample types. Orthotopic implantation allows more rapid model development, increasing the likelihood of developing an avatar model within a clinically useful timeframe.
Funder
Neuroblastoma Australia Kid's Cancer Alliance
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Cancer Research,Oncology
Reference49 articles.
1. Kaatsch, P. Epidemiology of childhood cancer. Cancer Treat. Rev. 36, 277–285 (2010). 2. Matthay, K. K., Maris, J. M., Schleiermacher, G., Nakagawara, A., Mackall, C. L., Diller, L. et al. Neuroblastoma. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers 2, 16078 (2016). 3. Pinto, N. R., Applebaum, M. A., Volchenboum, S. L., Matthay, K. K., London, W. B., Ambros, P. F. et al. Advances in risk classification and treatment strategies for neuroblastoma. J. Clin. Oncol. 33, 3008–3017 (2015). 4. London, W. B., Bagatell, R., Weigel, B. J., Fox, E., Guo, D., Van Ryn, C. et al. Historical time to disease progression and progression-free survival in patients with recurrent/refractory neuroblastoma treated in the modern era on Children's Oncology Group early-phase trials. Cancer. 123, 4914–4923 (2017). 5. Cohen, L. E., Gordon, J. H., Popovsky, E. Y., Gunawardene, S., Duffey-Lind, E., Lehmann, L. E. et al. Late effects in children treated with intensive multimodal therapy for high-risk neuroblastoma: high incidence of endocrine and growth problems. Bone Marrow Transplant. 49, 502–508 (2014).
Cited by
34 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|