Author:
Roberto Anna,Colombo Cinzia,Candiani Giulia,Satolli Roberto,Giordano Livia,Jaramillo Lina,Castagno Roberta,Mantellini Paola,Falini Patrizia,Carnesciali Eva,Valenza Mario,Costa Liliana,Campari Cinzia,Caroli Stefania,Faggiano Roberto Cosimo,Orione Lorenzo,Belmessieri Bruna,Marchiò Vanda,Deandrea Silvia,Silvestri Anna,Luciano Daniela,Paci Eugenio,Mosconi Paola
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Improving the quality of information and communication is a priority in organised breast cancer screening and an ethical duty. Programmes must offer the information each woman is looking for, promoting informed decision-making. This study aimed to develop and evaluate a web-based dynamic decision aid (DA).
Methods
A pragmatic randomised trial carried out in six regional organised screening programmes recruited women at the first invitation receiving DA or a web-based standard brochure (SB). The primary outcome was informed choice measured on knowledge, attitudes, and intentions. Follow-up period: 7–10 days. Secondary outcomes included participation rate, satisfaction, decisional conflict, and acceptability of DA.
Results
Two thousand one hundred and nineteen women were randomised and 1001 completed the study. Respectively, 43.9% and 36.9% in the DA and SB reached the informed choice. The DA gave a 13-point higher proportion of women aware about overdiagnosis compared to SB (38.3% versus 25.2%, p < 0.0001). The percentage of women attending screening was the same: 84% versus 83%. Decisional conflict was significantly lower in the DA group (14.4%) than in the SB group (19.3%).
Conclusion
DA increases informed choice. Complete information including the pros, cons, controversies, and overdiagnosis–overtreatment issues boost a woman’s knowledge without reducing the rate of actual screening participation.
Clinical trial registration
ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT 03097653.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC