Clinical utility of circulating tumour cell-based monitoring of late-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer: the randomised CirCe01 trial
-
Published:2021-01-21
Issue:7
Volume:124
Page:1207-1213
-
ISSN:0007-0920
-
Container-title:British Journal of Cancer
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Br J Cancer
Author:
Cabel LucORCID, Berger Frédérique, Cottu PaulORCID, Loirat Delphine, Rampanou Aurore, Brain Etienne, Cyrille Stacy, Bourgeois Hugues, Kiavue Nicolas, Deluche Elise, Ladoire Sylvain, Campone Mario, Pierga Jean-Yves, Bidard Francois-ClementORCID
Abstract
Abstract
Background
CirCe01 trial aimed to assess the clinical utility of circulating tumour cell (CTC)-based monitoring in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients beyond the third line of chemotherapy (LC).
Methods
CirCe01 was a prospective, multicentre, randomised trial (NCT01349842) that included patients with MBC after two systemic LC. Patients with ≥5 CTC/7.5 mL (CellSearch®) were randomised between the CTC-driven and the standard arm. In the CTC arm, changes in CTC count were assessed at the first cycle of each LC; patients in whom CTC levels predicted early tumour progression had to switch to a subsequent LC.
Results
Greater than or equal to 5 CTC/7.5 mL were observed in N = 101/204 patients. In the CTC arm (N = 51), 43 (83%) and 18 (44%) patients completed CTC monitoring in the third and fourth lines, respectively, and 18 (42%) and 11 (61%) of these patients, respectively, had no CTC response. Thirteen (72%) and 5 (46%) of these patients underwent early switch to the next LC. Overall survival was not different between the two arms (hazard ratio = 0.95, 95% confidence interval = [0.6;1.4], p = 0.8). In subgroup analyses, patients with no CTC response who switched chemotherapy experienced longer survival than patients who did not.
Conclusions
Due to the limited accrual and compliance, this trial failed to demonstrate the clinical utility of CTC monitoring.
Clinical Trial Registration
NCT, NCT01349842, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01349842, registered 9 May 2011.
Funder
La Ligue Contre le Cancer and the French Ministry of Health
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Cancer Research,Oncology
Reference17 articles.
1. Torre, L. A., Bray, F., Siegel, R. L., Ferlay, J., Lortet-Tieulent, J. & Jemal, A. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J. Clin. 65, 87–108 (2015). 2. Gobbini, E., Ezzalfani, M., Dieras, V., Bachelot, T., Brain, E., Debled, M. et al. Time trends of overall survival among metastatic breast cancer patients in the real-life ESME cohort. Eur. J. Cancer 96, 17–24 (2018). 3. Cardoso, F., Senkus, E., Costa, A., Papadopoulos, E., Aapro, M., André, F. et al. 4th ESO-ESMO International Consensus Guidelines for Advanced Breast Cancer (ABC 4)†. Ann. Oncol. 29, 1634–1657 (2018). 4. Cortes, J., O’Shaughnessy, J., Loesch, D., Blum, J. L., Vahdat, L. T., Petrakova, K. et al. Eribulin monotherapy versus treatment of physician’s choice in patients with metastatic breast cancer (EMBRACE): a phase 3 open-label randomised study. Lancet 377, 914–923 (2011). 5. Palumbo, R., Sottotetti, F., Riccardi, A., Teragni, C., Pozzi, E., Quaquarini, E. et al. Which patients with metastatic breast cancer benefit from subsequent lines of treatment? An update for clinicians. Ther. Adv. Med. Oncol. 5, 334–350 (2013).
Cited by
40 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|