Abstract
Abstract
Background
South Asian ancestry populations are underrepresented in genomic studies and therapeutics trials. British South Asians suffer from multi-morbidity leading to polypharmacy. Our objective was to elucidate British South Asian ancestry community perspectives on pharmacogenomic implementation and sharing pharmacogenomic clinical data for research.
Methods
Four focus groups were conducted (9–12 participants in each). Two groups were mixed gender, while one group was male only and one was female only. Simultaneous interpretation was available to participants in Urdu and Bengali. Focus groups were recorded and abridged transcription and thematic analysis were undertaken.
Results
There were 42 participants, 64% female. 26% were born in the UK or Europe. 52% were born in Bangladesh and 17% in Pakistan. 36% reported university level education.
Implementation of pharmacogenomics was perceived to be beneficial to individuals but pose a risk of overburdening resource limited systems. Pharmacogenomic research was perceived to be beneficial to the community, with concerns about data privacy and misuse. Data sharing was desirable if the researchers did not have a financial stake, and benefits would be shared.
Trust was the key condition for the acceptability of both clinical implementation and research. Trust was linked with medication compliance. Education, outreach, and communication facilitate trust.
Conclusions (Significance and Impact of the Study)
Pharmacogenomics implementation with appropriate education and communication has the potential to enhance trust and contribute to increased medication compliance. Trust drives data sharing, which would enable enhanced representation in research. Representation in scientific evidence base could cyclically enhance trust and compliance.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Pharmacology,Genetics,Molecular Medicine
Reference23 articles.
1. Ethnic group, England and Wales: Census 2021: The ethnic groups of usual residents and household ethnic composition in England and Wales, Census 2021 data. 2022.
2. Popejoy AB, Fullerton SM. Genomics is failing on diversity. Nature. 2016;538:161–4.
3. Martin AR, Kanai M, Kamatani Y, Okada Y, Neale BM, Daly MJ. Clinical use of current polygenic risk scores may exacerbate health disparities. Nat Genet. 2019;51:584–91.
4. Lolic M, Araojo R, Okeke M, Woodcock J. Racial and Ethnic Representation in US Clinical Trials of New Drugs and Biologics, 2015-9. JAMA. 2021;326:2201.
5. PharmGKB and CPIC. Gene-specific Information Tables for CYP2C19. 2022.