An open source machine learning framework for efficient and transparent systematic reviews

Author:

van de Schoot RensORCID,de Bruin JonathanORCID,Schram Raoul,Zahedi ParisaORCID,de Boer JanORCID,Weijdema FelixORCID,Kramer BiancaORCID,Huijts MartijnORCID,Hoogerwerf MaartenORCID,Ferdinands GerbrichORCID,Harkema AlbertORCID,Willemsen JoukjeORCID,Ma YongchaoORCID,Fang QixiangORCID,Hindriks Sybren,Tummers LarsORCID,Oberski Daniel L.ORCID

Abstract

AbstractTo help researchers conduct a systematic review or meta-analysis as efficiently and transparently as possible, we designed a tool to accelerate the step of screening titles and abstracts. For many tasks—including but not limited to systematic reviews and meta-analyses—the scientific literature needs to be checked systematically. Scholars and practitioners currently screen thousands of studies by hand to determine which studies to include in their review or meta-analysis. This is error prone and inefficient because of extremely imbalanced data: only a fraction of the screened studies is relevant. The future of systematic reviewing will be an interaction with machine learning algorithms to deal with the enormous increase of available text. We therefore developed an open source machine learning-aided pipeline applying active learning: ASReview. We demonstrate by means of simulation studies that active learning can yield far more efficient reviewing than manual reviewing while providing high quality. Furthermore, we describe the options of the free and open source research software and present the results from user experience tests. We invite the community to contribute to open source projects such as our own that provide measurable and reproducible improvements over current practice.

Funder

This project was funded by the Innovation Fund for IT in Research Projects, Utrecht University, The Netherlands.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Artificial Intelligence,Computer Networks and Communications,Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition,Human-Computer Interaction,Software

Reference63 articles.

1. Bornmann, L. & Mutz, R. Growth rates of modern science: a bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references. J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 66, 2215–2222 (2015).

2. Gough, D., Oliver, S. & Thomas, J. An Introduction to Systematic Reviews (Sage, 2017).

3. Cooper, H. Research Synthesis and Meta-analysis: A Step-by-Step Approach (SAGE Publications, 2015).

4. Liberati, A. et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 62, e1–e34 (2009).

5. Boaz, A. et al. Systematic Reviews: What have They Got to Offer Evidence Based Policy and Practice? (ESRC UK Centre for Evidence Based Policy and Practice London, 2002).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3