Abstract
AbstractAs science and technology rapidly progress, it becomes increasingly important to understand how individuals comprehend expository technical texts that explain these advances. This study examined differences in individual readers’ technical comprehension performance and differences among texts, using functional brain imaging to measure regional brain activity while students read passages on technical topics and then took a comprehension test. Better comprehension of the technical passages was related to higher activation in regions of the left inferior frontal gyrus, left superior parietal lobe, bilateral dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, and bilateral hippocampus. These areas are associated with the construction of a mental model of the passage and with the integration of new and prior knowledge in memory. Poorer comprehension of the passages was related to greater activation of the ventromedial prefrontal cortex and the precuneus, areas involved in autobiographical and episodic memory retrieval. More comprehensible passages elicited more brain activation associated with establishing links among different types of information in the text and activation associated with establishing conceptual coherence within the text representation. These findings converge with previous behavioral research in their implications for teaching technical learners to become better comprehenders and for improving the structure of instructional texts, to facilitate scientific and technological comprehension.
Funder
United States Department of Defense | United States Navy | Office of Naval Research
National Science Foundation
United States Department of Defense | United States Navy | ONR | Office of Naval Research Global
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference91 articles.
1. Kintsch, W. & van Dijk, T. A. Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychol. Rev. 85, 363–394 (1978).
2. van Dijk, T. A. & Kintsch, W. Strategies of Discourse Comprehension (Academic Press, New York, 1983).
3. Lesgold, A. M. & Perfetti, C. A. Interactive processes in reading comprehension. Discourse Process. 1, 323–336 (1978).
4. Mar, R. A., Li, J., Nguyen, A. T. P. & Ta, C. P. Memory and comprehension of narrative versus expository texts: a meta-analysis. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 28, 732–749 (2021).
5. Millis, K. K. & Simon, S. Resource allocation during the rereading of scientific texts. Mem. Cogn. 26, 232–246 (1998).
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Perspective Chapter: Should the Hippocampus be Considered a Key Part of the Reading Network?;Hippocampus - Functions, Disorders, and Therapeutic Interventions [Working Title];2024-09-03