Validation of Cerebral Venous Oxygenation Measured Using Near-Infrared Spectroscopy and Partial Jugular Venous Occlusion in the Newborn Lamb

Author:

Wong Flora Y12,Barfield Charles P2,Campbell Louisa2,Brodecky Vojta A1,Walker Adrian M1

Affiliation:

1. Ritchie Centre for Baby Health Research, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia

2. Newborn Services, Monash Medical Centre, Clayton, Victoria, Australia

Abstract

Near-infrared spectroscopy combined with partial jugular venous occlusion (JVO) offers promise for determining cerebral venous saturation (CSvO2) in sick preterm infants, but has not been validated in the newborn brain or under conditions of hypoxaemia. We assessed the accuracy of the CSvO2 estimate using cerebral venous oxygen saturation in superior sagittal sinus blood (SSSO2) as the ‘gold standard’. Comparisons were made in seven newborn lambs over a wide range of arterial oxygen saturations (SaO2) of 20% to 100%. Overall, median (range) CSvO2 was 49.8% (10.6% to 88.5%), whereas SSSO2 was 45.5% (4.3% to 76.6%); Bland—Altman analysis revealed a mean difference (CSvO2—SSSO2) of 5.1% and limits of agreement of ±27.4%. The change in cerebral blood volume (Δ CBV) induced by JVO increased with SaO2 ( P <0.05). In addition, the strength of the correlation of CSvO2 with SSSO2 progressively improved with increasing change in total haemoglobin concentration (Δ HbT) induced by JVO. With Bland—Altman analysis repeated for data with Δ HbT >30 μmol cm, the mean difference (CSvO2—SSSO2) decreased to 2.4% with limits of agreement of ±18.8%. We conclude that the accuracy of estimating CSvO2 varies with the Δ CBV induced by JVO. Potential differences of optical properties between the head of the lamb and the human infant suggest that caution be exercised in directly applying these data to the human newborn. Nevertheless, this critical aspect of the JVO technique needs to be taken into consideration in developing an accurate measurement for sick preterm human infants.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Neurology (clinical),Neurology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3